tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-595246785446634961.post4511151810555875797..comments2024-03-12T02:18:13.968-07:00Comments on The Intercept: Blog For Arizona Makes False Accusations of Libel Over Terry Goddard, Censors RebuttalIntercepthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03780885180607579873noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-595246785446634961.post-21536251450691679322010-07-23T13:24:01.748-07:002010-07-23T13:24:01.748-07:00Michael Bryan:
I don't think I ever expressed...Michael Bryan:<br /><br />I don't think I ever expressed the belief that anyone is "obligated to carry" my comments. However, AZ Blue Meanie alleged that I am guilty of defamation, and I quite properly sought to respond in the same forum where the allegation was made. <br /><br />My original comment, and the responsive comments that followed, were neither "disruptive" nor "off-topic". In fact they were clearly on point and constructive. My initial comment expressed the opinion that election integrity matters because the title of the posted article says "Why elections matter", and obviously elections don't matter if there is no election integrity to make them trustworthy. <br /><br />AZ Blue Meanie's response to this rather constructive and mild-mannered comment was: "You...are not going to litigate this case in comments left on this blog. Write about it on your own blog. Do I make myself clear?" <br /><br />Wow! Who is this guy, Mel Gibson?! <br /><br />I responded to his comments about Bill Risner by providing information on the case and stating that Terry Goddard obstructed justice in this case, at the very least. This is responsive and on point.<br /><br />As for being "merely tedious", if AZ Blue Meanie held that opinion, it is perplexing why he would respond with such viciousness and what appears to be misogynistic rage. Yes, AZ Blue Meanie, I've been a naughty girl, and you make yourself clear!<br /><br />In all seriousness, anyone who endorses Meanie's laughably peurile actions on his blog cannot have their head screwed on straight. I'm sorry to hear that about you, Michael Bryan. Lisshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01576338686799443725noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-595246785446634961.post-22332541672297972072010-07-23T12:07:08.918-07:002010-07-23T12:07:08.918-07:00Disruptive? Off topic? Merely tedious? The thre...Disruptive? Off topic? Merely tedious? The thread speaks for itself. Michael Bryan is allowing a lot in the name of "discretion". <br /><br />The prejudice is directed toward those who are still wondering why Blog For Arizona, a site that once provided point by point coverage of the electronic records lawsuit, would suddenly clam up over the recent findings of missing RTA election poll tapes.<br /><br />What is obvious is the willingness to keep people in the dark about a significant finding that affects election integrity. This choice is made to protect Democratic gubernatorial candidate Terry Goddard, regardless of how he is becoming the suspects' wet dream. <br /><br />Let's examine this choice to keep people in the dark about current, significant findings affecting election integrity in order to protect one of their own candidates. The rationale seems to be that Jan Brewer must not be elected, no matter what the cost. Wasn't this the same rationale used for propping up a candidate like John Kerry to oppose George W. Bush in 2004? That same Kerry who refused to challenge the election, particularly in Ohio where it was definitively stolen? Right. <br /><br />So taking a page from the same book of folly, the AZ Democratic Party, by its very structure, finds it's only viable gubernatorial candidate to be Terry Goddard. Blog For Arizona decides to be the mouthpiece for the corporate influences that ultimately produced the reigning party structure. Instead of offering and entertaining any meaningful exchange of ideas, it elects instead to threaten, chastise, and remove anybody that brings up information that is less than favorable to their pet candidate.<br /><br />Instead of being so intrinsically involved with the party line, Blog For Arizona could be a great benefit to their party of choice by simply telling the truth.<br /><br />Did it ever occur to Goddard and company that he could still make this a campaign issue? Brewer is not only a shit governor, but she is currently just as weak on election integrity. She can't throw this stone at her opponent. Goddard could reopen the case, complete the examination and exact justice were it is needed in an expedited fashion if he so wished. <br /><br />That way Goddard would actually have a campaign instead of a loyal thought police.Intercepthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03780885180607579873noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-595246785446634961.post-45948646564699261112010-07-22T20:26:56.382-07:002010-07-22T20:26:56.382-07:00Blog For Arizona is not obligated to carry your co...Blog For Arizona is not obligated to carry your comments anymore than you are obligated to carry mine. If you are disruptive or off-topic, or even merely tedious, my writers have the discretion to remove your comments. Keep in mind that you are a guest on my blog when you comment. If you get up in the middle of a film and start yelling about something you think is vitally important, it doesn't mean those who tell you to shut up are conspiring to deny your free speech, it means that they want to see the film they came to see. Have some common courtesy and I daresay you will get your point across better when it's delivered in the proper context.<br /><br />Best Regards,<br />Michael Bryan<br />Editor, BlogForArizona.comAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-595246785446634961.post-43732624688063313732010-07-21T11:49:05.924-07:002010-07-21T11:49:05.924-07:00The free copy of the of the movie "Fatally Fl...The free copy of the of the movie "Fatally Flawed" should go to AZ bluemeanie! Any one who views it is sure to agree that there was "wrong doing" going on there!!<br />Ann Fairbanksdoghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11710724983213081972noreply@blogger.com