Global Research
Julie Levésque
After looking for a “smoking gun” in Iran earlier this year, Israeli special forces are now “tracking” Syria’s “stocks of chemical and biological weapons”, according to The Sunday Times.
“The cross-border operation is part of a
secret war to trail Syria’s non-conventional armaments and sabotage
their development. ‘For years we’ve known the exact location of Syria’s
chemical and biological munitions,’ an Israeli source said, referring to
the country’s spy satellites and drones. ‘But in the past week we’ve
got signs that munitions have been moved to new locations.’” (Uzi
Mahnaimi and Lucy Fisher Israel tracks Syria’s chemical arsenal, The Sunday Times 9 December 2012.)
Those involved in the Iraq WMD propaganda ploy are now applying their skills with a view to fabricating a WMD pretext to intervene in Syria. According to a report from the Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies at Tel Aviv University, “Israelis ‘misread’ the Iraqi threat”. In 2003, the BBC wrote on the report’s findings:
Israeli intelligence miscalculated the
threat posed by Saddam Hussein […] This contributed to the “false”
picture painted by US and British services […]
“Israeli
intelligence was a full partner with the US and Britain in developing a
false picture of Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction
capability,” said the author of the report, retired Brigadier General
Shlomo Brom.
“It badly overestimated the Iraqi threat to Israel and reinforced the American and British belief that the weapons existed.”
“From now on, when we present serious
data on other countries, like Iran for example, who will treat us
seriously?” Israel Radio quoted Israeli left-wing parliamentarian Yossi
Sarid as saying. (Israelis ‘misread’ Iraqi threat, BBC,December 5, 2003)
There is no evidence that Iran has nuclear weapons, even US intelligence agencies agree on that. Global Research ran a story on the Israeli covert op, potentially fabricating WMD evidence in relation to Iran. What is now unfolding in relation to Syria’s alleged WMD is a rerun of previous attempts to funnel fabricated evidence into the news chain:
Western sources told the Times Israel was
monitoring “radioactivity and magnitude of explosives tests” and that
“special forces used Black Hawk helicopters to carry commandos disguised
as members of the Iranian military and using Iranian military
vehicles”. The sources believe “Iranians are trying to hide evidence of
warhead tests in preparation for a possible IAEA visit”. (Cited in Report: Israeli soldiers scour Iran for nukes, Ynet, March 25, 2012)
The
number of Israeli intelligence missions focussing on the Parchin
military base in Iran has increased in the past few months, according to
the article. During that period, Tehran has been negotiating with the
IAEA which had requested to visit Parchin. According to Iran’s permanent
representative to the IAEA, Ali Asghar Soltanieh, both parties had
agreed in early February that the visit would take place in March.
(Gareth Porter, Details of Talks with IAEA Belie Charge Iran Refused Cooperation, IPS,March 21, 2012)
The IAEA requested to visit Parchin in
late January and late February, after having agreed to a visit in March.
The IAEA thus requested to visit the military complex exactly at the
same time Israel was intensifying its secret operations to allegedly
search for a “smoking gun”. (Julie Lévesque, Fabricating a “Smoking Gun” to Attack Iran? Israeli Spies Disguised as Iranian Soldiers on Mission Inside Iran Global Research,March 27, 2012)
[…]Israel’s covert activities against the
Syrian government’s chemical and biological arsenal go back almost 30
years. Reputedly, some of the more recent such activities may have
involved the targeting of Russian scientists.
Although Russia routinely denies it,
it is believed that Syria’s non-conventional arsenal was significantly
augmented in the late 1980s and early 1990s with the help of Russian
retired general Anatoliy Kuntsevich [...]
Interestingly, Kuntsevich died suddenly
in 2003 onboard a flight from the Syrian capital to Moscow. It was
widely speculated at the time that the Mossad, Israel’s covert-action
agency, may have played a role in the Russian general’s sudden death. In
2010, another retired Russian general, Yuri Ivanov, who had served as
Deputy Director of the GRU, Russia’s military intelligence agency, died in unclear circumstances […]
According to
reports in the Israeli press, the former GRU official was on his way to
a meeting with Syrian intelligence officers when he went
missing. Israel has never acknowledged having played a part in Ivanon’s
death, but many suspect that Tel Aviv had been targeting the two
Russians for quite some time. (Joseph Fitsanakis Israel special forces conducting cross-border operations in Syria, intelNews.org, December 10, 2012.)
The reduction [of Israel’s covert
operations in Iran] runs across a wide spectrum of operations, cutting
back not only alleged high-profile missions such as
assassinations and detonations at Iranian missile bases, but also
efforts to gather firsthand on-the-ground intelligence and recruit spies
inside the Iranian program, according to the officials. (Karl Vick, Mossad Cutting Back on Covert Operations Inside Iran, Officials Say, TIME, March 30, 2012, quoted in Julie Lévesque, “Running Short of New Targets: Israel’s Secret Service is “Cutting Back on Assassinations” in Iran, Global Research, April 17, 2012.)
Since the beginning of the armed insurrection in March 2011, the US and its allies alongside the Western mainstream media have been blaming the Syrian government for committing atrocities directed against civilians, including the Houla massacre. According to independent media reports as well as the testimony of witnesses on the ground, these atrocities were committed by the US-NATO sponsored opposition forces.
The Syrian government has been demonized to such an extent by the mainstream media that if an attack were to occur, public opinion could easily be led to believe, without evidence, that the Syrian government is responsible for crimes against its own people.
This is a perfect context for a false flag operation or intensive propaganda involving chemical weapons. These allegations based on fake WMD evidence directed against the Syrian government could be used once again to pressure the UN Security Council to give NATO a “legal mandate” to intervene in Syria under the “responsibility to protect” doctrine.
CNN recently reported that the US and “some European allies are using defense contractors to train Syrian rebels on how to secure chemical weapons stockpiles in Syria.” The Syrian government expressed its concerns in a letter to the UN:
What raises concerns about this news
circulated by the media is our serious fear that some of the countries
backing terrorism and terrorists might provide the armed terrorist
groups with chemical weapons and claim that it was the Syrian government
that used the weapons [...] (Quoted in John Glaser, US Defense Contractors Training Syrian Rebels to Handle Chemical Weapons, Antiwar.com, December 10, 2012.)
No comments:
Post a Comment