Monday, July 26, 2010

More Details Emerge About Missing RTA Poll Tapes

Note: Read AUDIT AZ's Statement about early ballot counting here.

Not only did Pima County employees have access to the RTA ballot boxes, it appears that the Democratic party was mislead by Pima County about the records being protected. In the Democratic Party's most recent Motion for Deposition of Iron Mountain Company, Pima County Administrator Chuck Huckleberry is quoted as follows:

In addition, we need to protect, secure and seal any information related to Division of Elections actions regarding not only the November 2006 election, but also the May 2006 RTA election. Even thought the ballots/returns for the RTA election are eleigible for destruction puruant to A.R.S. 16.-624, please ensure that all ballot and election returns for this election now stored at our contract records management facility are retained, with specific instructions not to destroy these documents. Further, since the allegations are against an official of the Division of Elections, it would be appropriate to ensure that there are very specific instructions approved by the County Attorney to the contract records management firm that Division of Elections personnel, including you as the Director, and myself as your immediate supervisor, are not granted any independent access to said records without independent oversight and supervision. This will ensure that County Administration and the Division of Elections cannot be accused of having independent access to the ballots and altering same.

Mr. Huckleberry concluded:

We need to take action to ensure that all documentation, ballots, electronic files and other information sources are secured so they cannot be altered, tampered with or destroyed as I am sure an accurate and independent review of this material will verify that the allegations are made by Mr. Risner are absolutely untrue.

As Bill Risner puts it:

In spite of Pima county's strong statement that "all documentation" and "other information sources" would be secured and Iron Mountain would be so instructed based upon "specific instructions approved by the County Attorney" the Iron Mountain manager testified that such instructions were never made.

At the moment that Terry Goddard and his men took possession of the ballots and poll tapes, workers at the Iron Mountain facility could have been asked about who had access to the boxes containing the RTA election materials. What they would have learned at this moment should have been enough to inform them of the need to forensically check the ballots to determine if they are genuine.

AZ Attorney General Terry Goddard's actions surrounding the poll tapes involves Bill Risner's letter to Terry Goddard informing him of the Democratic Party's pending agreement to obtain the poll tapes from the RTA election. In this letter, Bill Risner informed Terry Goddard that the poll tapes would be inspected by an expert who can easily detect a specific type of foul play. This form of cheating involves the reprogramming of flash memory cards. Each precinct recorded their specific result onto their own flash memory card. The Pima County Elections Division is suspected of reprogramming a portion of the cards to create results that reflect something different than actual results of their corresponding precinct's vote totals. When this form of cheating is successful, poll workers would simply print out the corresponding poll tape and sign the tape for verification without suspecting any foul play. An expert with a hand lens, however, can detect imperfections attributable to a reprogrammed flash memory card. Once the poll workers have finished, the flash memory card is then delivered to the main elections office for the central tabulator. At this point, it's important to note that even when the flash card reprogramming is unsuccessful, end of day poll tapes would still be generated at the precincts.

Remember, the Pima County Elections division is suspected of reprogramming these flash memory cards for three main reasons (out of at least 20):

1. Electronic data won by the records lawsuit indicate that many flash memory cards had to be re-uploaded numerous times at the central tabulator's office. Reprogramming a flash memory card can be difficult and the typical errors that occur involve problems in uploading to the central tabulator. It is estimated that up to 140 cards had to be re-uploaded to the central tabulator and a large portion were re-uploaded repeatedly. These problems are symptomatic of poorly programmed flash memory cards and provide stark contrast to 2004's election in which only 4 cards were re-uploaded. When such a massive number of failures occurred in the 2006 RTA election, the Pima County Elections Division chose not to inform their vendor of these issues.

2. During the 2006 RTA election, Pima County was found to be in possession of the precise, obscure tool used to reprogram the very type of flash memory cards used in Pima County's election machines. The excuse by the County for having such contraband was that the computer technician wanted to find out whether such reprogramming of flash memory cards was possible with that specific device. This explanation contradicts Pima County's contention that security threats can only come from outside of the elections division.

3. A whistleblower has come forward with a sworn affidavit testifying that Bryan Crane told him privately while at the Boondocks Lounge that he had “fixed” the RTA election under direction from his bosses. Two additional people signed affidavits placing Bryan Crane at the Boondocks Lounge at the time of this confession, despite Crane telling the Arizona Daily Star that he'd never heard of the Boondocks Lounge.

Attorney General Terry Goddard's decision to take the poll tapes with the ballots appears to have been made after it became clear to him that the Democratic Party was close to obtaining the poll tapes and that an expert could detect foul play by looking at those poll tapes. This is logical behavior for somebody wishing to prevent the discovery of foul play through the poll tapes.

Another new piece to this puzzle is evidence that Terry Goddard's office was made aware of the legal struggle that the Democratic Party would be forced to endure if the Attorney General's office did not inspect the poll tapes and/or made them inaccessible again by putting the poll tapes back in the ballot boxes. Terry Goddard had the specific choice to examine the poll tapes or to participate with the Democratic Party and allow their experts to inspect the poll tapes. His choice was to keep interested parties from inspecting the poll tapes, to prevent access to the poll tapes, and to saddle the Democratic Party with another year of litigation to obtain access to the poll tapes. Again, this is logical behavior for somebody wishing to prevent the discovery of foul play through the poll tapes.

There is very strong circumstantial evidence that Terry Goddard is an accessory to the crimes likely committed by Pima County's elections division during the 2006 RTA election. Terry Goddard clearly had a choice to follow the straight and narrow in his investigation and examine all of the evidence. Instead, he opted to perform an exercise in public relations by presenting the illusion of an investigation. Why else would a seasoned white collar crime investigator go to the trouble of counting ballots behind glass and announcing his "findings" to the public yet leave so many stones left unturned?


  1. What would Goddard gain by doing this stuff? AGs are typically smarter than to expose themselves to criminal charges. It's all conjecture, of course, but motive here is a head-scratcher.

    The truth is not yet known, but thanks to some real heroes we might yet know it...

  2. That's the angle I was originally considering for this article. Goddard's campaign seems to be:
    "Vote for me. I'm not as bad as Jan Brewer". Here's what my thoughts over your question looked like:

    Why did Terry Goddard participate in the whitewash of the RTA Election? What has he to gain by doing this? Is Goddard compromised in some situation that the public is not aware of? Perhaps he was promised his turn at bat as Governor of Arizona like his father, Sam Goddard, who was the governor of Arizona in the 1960's. Terry Goddard has twice sought the Democratic Party's nomination for governor and has twice lost this party's nomination. Now he runs unopposed as his party's nominee for governor, but he is currently behind his Republican opponent Jan Brewer by 20 percentage points according to two polls, probably through Jan Brewer's use of controversial law SB1070 to hijack the immigration issue. With three months left in this election, what does Goddard have on the front page of his site to differentiate himself from Brewer? Mostly immigration stories. Terry Goddard's confidence in the face of this polling disparity is unfounded, unless he has already been anointed Governor of Arizona.

    Understanding what we know about the state of elections in two of the most densely populated counties (Pima and Maricopa) in Arizona, we know that it's more important for the reigning power structure to create the illusion that public opinion is being influenced than than to actually change public opinion. The way the law stands now, it is currently impossible to catch election facilitators in the act of cheating in a timely enough fashion to challenge an election.

    This illusion, however, is wearing thin. Local mainstream media are being called into question daily for choosing to ignore the missing poll tapes from the 2006 RTA election. Party loyalists are working feverishly to draw attention away from this issue even when it affects their own credibility. In the past, it was easy for mainstream corporate media to confuse the public about these issues and dismiss election integrity activists as "conspiracy theorists". This story, however, has become the elephant in the room, especially with its simplicity - "Poll Tapes Missing in 2006 RTA Election".

    Should Terry Goddard win his election for governor, how will he ever remove this stain from this record? How could he continue with this short-term PR campaign to election day when this issue will remain long after he is governor?

    And if Goddard had a spine:

    It's not too late for Goddard and company to make this a campaign issue. Brewer is not only a shit governor, but she is currently just as weak on election integrity. She can't throw this stone of election integrity at her opponent. Goddard could reopen the case, complete his investigation and exact justice were it is needed in an expedited fashion if he so wished.

    That way Goddard would actually have a campaign instead of a loyal thought police.

  3. Wow, so the county administrator told everyone that they would not allow anyone to access the ballots, but he forgot to inform the guys who actually held the ballots? How can that be incompetence? Unless...

    Maybe at some point in political power to keep going up in the political system based on "perception management" and such you become more of an image in your public servant life than a conscious person who holds the responsibilities of office? Maybe this might explain "why would Goddard do this?"

    Of course, it could just be said to be "flat-ass" corruption?