Showing posts with label slave labor. Show all posts
Showing posts with label slave labor. Show all posts

Saturday, September 22, 2012

PRISON INDUSTRY STEALING U.S. JOBS

Editor's Note: Real unemployment is as high as %40

American Free Press
Keith Johnson


•With 8% unemployment, why are prisoners working while citizens aren’t?

By Keith Johnson

As if American businesses don’t have enough trouble competing with free traders, who exploit cheap labor in third world countries to make sizable profits, they are also fighting government-run corporations that pay prisoners pennies on the dollar to manufacture cheap goods and undercut private industry.

Is it any wonder that the United States has the highest rate of incarceration in the industrialized world? According to a recent report on cable news, the U.S. government is using federal prison inmates to steal business away from civilian manufacturers by producing comparable merchandise for pennies on the dollar.

At the very heart of this scheme is Federal Prison Industries, or Unicor, a U.S. government-owned corporation that employs 13K prisoners at slave wages to produce everything from windbreakers to solar panels. Although the agency is currently restricted to selling their products exclusively to the federal government, they still cut into a major slice of several industrial markets.

Michael Mansh, owner-operator of Ashland Sales and Service, a Pennsylvania apparel manufacturer that does contract work for the U.S. Air Force (USAF), recently spoke with this AMERICAN FREE PRESS reporter about the impact Unicor has on many small businesses.

“I make certain products, and [Unicor] makes the identical product,” said Mansh. “They get paid higher prices than commercial manufacturers even though their labor rates range somewhere between 23¢ and $1.15 per hour. They don’t pay workers compensation,they don’t pay taxes  and they don’t have to pay any of the benefits private enterprise has to pay—yet they get paid a higher price by Department of Defense than I do.”

In February, Mansh discovered that Unicor was close to stealing away his contract with the USAF, a move that would have forced him to close his plant in Olive Hill, Kentucky and lay off 100 workers. That month, he appeared on the television show Fox and Friends and made a desperate plea for help.

“We’re hopeful that this broadcast today will get the American people behind us and perhaps save these jobs,” Mansh told the show’s hosts.

Apparently, that paid off. According to Mansh, “24 hours later, Unicor decided not to offer on the solicitation to take [the contract] away. So from my standpoint, as a short-term event, we won a battle.”

However, Mansh stressed that the long-term battle is very far from over.

“Unicor continues to look for ways to take work away from domestic companies every chance they get,” he said.

Mansh added that it’s difficult for most companies to compete with Unicor because of existing U.S. government policy designating them as a mandatory source preference. “The Department of Defense and other federal agencies are obligated to buy from Unicor if they can provide a comparable product to one that is offered by a commercial manufacturer,” he explained. “The government basically has no choice but to buy the product from them.”

And although Unicor pays slave wages to the prisoners it employs, Mansh argued that none of those savings are passed along to the taxpayer.

“The taxpayer doesn’t get a benefit because Unicor sells the product at a comparable rate to commercial manufacturers,” he said.

When asked how Unicor justifies this, Mansh explained: “They say they are less efficient and it takes six to eight of their workers to do what one of ours does. Another argument they make is that it’s their job to be inefficient in order to employ the most inmates.”

Mansh doesn’t buy this argument.

“If their goal is to employ the most and be the least efficient, then why do they purchase state-of-the-art automated equipment that makes them even more efficient?” he asked. “It’s a complete reversal of what they’re saying.”

Although it may sound like Unicor is running a for-profit business, Mansh believes that the exorbitant prices they charge for products are absorbed by a bloated government bureaucracy and the usual wasteful spending that goes along with it.

“If private enterprise was given the $700M per year that is currently being done by inmates, they wouldn’t need to pay all those government salaries that are running the program,” said Mansh. “[Unicor] has about 6K employees who work in their clothing and textiles segment alone. That’s 6K jobs that would be created in this economy. With unemployment over 8% in this country, it’s disgraceful to me that we’d have prisoners, rather than citizen taxpayers, doing the work.”

A recently introduced bill, cosponsored by 28 lawmakers in the House of Representatives, aims to rein in Unicor’s advantage on government contracts.

When asked if he was optimistic about this move, Mansh conceded: “Do I take a positive view? The answer is, no. There has to be some sort of ground swell in this country. A few weeks ago there was some controversy because [American athletes were wearing] Olympic uniforms made in China. There was a huge outcry from Congress. . . . Somehow that same focus has to be put on this. We have federal inmates making products for our military and taking jobs from taxpayers. This isn’t right.”

——
Keith Johnson is an independent journalist and the editor of “Revolt of the Plebs,” an alternative news website. Keith is also a licensed private detective.

Sunday, January 29, 2012

Apple hit by boycott call over worker abuses in China

The Guardian
Paul Harris

US writers attack conditions at Foxconn plant and call for consumers to act


Apple, the computer giant whose sleek products have become a mainstay of modern life, is dealing with a public relations disaster and the threat of calls for a boycott of its iPhones and iPads.

The company's public image took a dive after revelations about working conditions in the factories of some of its network of Chinese suppliers. The allegations, reported at length in the New York Times, build on previous concerns about abuses at firms that Apple uses to make its bestselling computers and phones. Now the dreaded word "boycott" has started to appear in media coverage of its activities.

"Should consumers boycott Apple?" asked a column in the Los Angeles Times as it recounted details of the bad PR fallout.

The influential Daily Beast and Newsweek technology writer Dan Lyons wrote a scathing piece. "It's barbaric," he said, before saying to his readership: "Ultimately the blame lies not with Apple and other electronics companies – but with us, the consumers. And ultimately we are the ones who must demand change."

Forbes magazine columnist Peter Cohan also got in on the act. "If you add up all the workers who have died to build your iPhone or iPad, the number is shockingly high," he began an article that also toyed with the idea of a boycott in its headline.

The New York Times's revelations, which centred on the Foxconn plant in southern China that has repeatedly been the subject of accusations of worker mistreatment, have caused a major stir in the US. Although such allegations have been made before in numerous news outlets, and in a controversial one-man show by playwright Mike Daisey, this time they have struck a chord.

The newspaper detailed allegations that workers at Foxconn suffered in conditions that resembled a modern version of bonded labour, working obscenely long shifts in unhealthy conditions with few of the labour rights that workers in the west would take for granted. It also mentioned disturbing events elsewhere in China among supplier firms, such as explosions at iPad factories that killed a total of four people and another incident in which 137 workers were injured after cleaning iPhone screens with a poisonous chemical.

Apple has come out fighting, which is no surprise given the remarkable success that the company has seen in recent years.

Through the iPod, iPhone and now the iPad tablet computer, Apple has revolutionised lifestyles across the world and built up a cult of worshippers. It has also generated billions of dollars in profits, in part due to the cheapness of Chinese labour.

Wednesday, July 6, 2011

US State Dept. slams Israel over human trafficking

Globes
Ran Dagoni

The State Department report takes Israel to task for not complying with minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking.


"The Government of Israel does not fully comply with the minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking; however, it is making significant efforts to do so," says the US Department of State in its "Trafficking in Persons Report for 2011". It adds, "Israel continued law enforcement actions against sex trafficking and continued to make strong prevention efforts. The government continued to take inadequate steps, however, to identify and protect labor trafficking victims and prosecute and convict labor trafficking offenders in the reporting period."

The State Department classifies countries with three ratings, "tier 1" countries that comply with the minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking, mostly countries in Europe and North America; "tier 2" countries that not comply with the minimum standards, and have large numbers of human trafficking, but which make efforts to combat it; and "tier 3" countries that neither comply with the minimal standards and make no effort to do so. Israel is classified as a "tier 2" country.

Israel's "tier 2" peers include Afghanistan, Angola, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belarus, Burkina Faso, Ethiopia, Iraq, Jordan, Pakistan, Rwanda, Syria, as well as India, China, Russia, and developed countries such as Iceland, Japan, Greece, and Switzerland.

The report on Israel is little different from the previous reports. It says, "Israel is a destination country for men and women subjected to forced labor and sex trafficking. Low-skilled workers from Thailand, China, Nepal, the Philippines, India, Sri Lanka, and, to a lesser extent, Romania, migrate voluntarily and legally to Israel for temporary contract labor in construction, agriculture, and home health care provision.

"Some, however, subsequently face conditions of forced labor, including through such practices as the unlawful withholding of passports, restrictions on movement, inability to change or otherwise choose one’s employer, nonpayment of wages, threats, sexual assault, and physical intimidation. Many labor recruitment agencies in source countries and in Israel require workers to pay recruitment fees typically ranging from $4,000 to $20,000 - a practice making workers highly vulnerable to trafficking or debt bondage once working in Israel. One NGO noted that recruitment fees increased in 2010."

The report cites Ministry of Interior figures, which say that 14,000 migrants entered Israel from Sinai in 2010, up from 5,000 in 2009.

Tuesday, May 25, 2010

Update: Protest at Chinese iPad maker Foxconn after 11th suicide this year

Protestors made traditional Chinese funeral offerings to the dead at the head-quarters of Foxconn, the manufacturer of Apple's iPad, after the 11th suicide at the company's factories so far this year. Yet another young factory worker took his own life at Foxconn's Longhua factory on Tuesday morning.

"[The deaths] force us to question the future of the 'factory of the world' and the new generation of migrant workers," according to nine Chinese social sciences professors in an open letter to Foxconn last week. "This new generation of workers is better-educated, has higher dreams, more thoughts, and can feel greater suffering," said broadcasters on the state-run CCTV.

It added that workers at Foxconn, faced with 12-hour days, seven days a week, are less able to "chi ku", or"eat bitterness", than hardbitten older workers.

Read the entire article at The Telegraph.