Court Pleadings Charge U.S. Complicity in Mexico's Drug War

IPS
Emilio Godoy
Kanya D'Almeida

MEXICO CITY/WASHINGTON, Aug 9, 2011 (IPS) - Late last week, the son of a top dog in Mexico's notorious Sinaloa drug cartel filed pleadings in a Chicago federal court accusing the U.S. government and its agencies of giving the cartel "carte blanche to continue to smuggle tons of illicit drugs into Chicago and the rest of the United States".

The charges, though virtually ignored by the U.S. media, have opened a window on U.S. drug policy south of its border, which many analysts have decried as corrupt and ineffective for years.

In his two-page court pleading, Jesus Vicente Zambada-Niebla – the son of Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada Garcia, an alleged leader of the Mexico- based Sinaloa drug- and weapons-trafficking organisation - described a collaborative relationship between the cartel and the U.S. Department of Justice and its many arms, including agencies such as the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

In late 2009, Zambada-Niebla was arrested in Mexico City and extradited to the U.S. to stand trial on charges of being the "logistical coordinator" for the cartel, specifically for overseeing an operation that shipped "multi-ton quantities of cocaine" into the U.S. using various transport methods from Boeing 747 cargo aircraft to tractor-trailers.

According to Bill Conroy, a journalist who broke this story and several others for Narco News a full week ahead of other media outlets, Zambada-Niebla also claims to have been an asset for the U.S. government, including being a party to deals struck between DEA agents and hard-hitters of the Sinaloa organisation. These allegedly included promises of protection by the DEA in exchange for information about rival cartels.


Zambada-Niebla's pleadings claim that protection included promises to the cartel leadership to be kept apprised of U.S. and Mexican government investigations occurring close to the "home territories of [Sinaloa's leaders] so that [they] could take appropriate actions to evade investigators," even though the U.S. government had indictments, extradition requests, and rewards for the apprehension of certain members of Sinaloa's leadership.

The pleadings indicate that U.S. officials acted on the assumption that keeping Mexican authorities in the dark about backroom security deals with one of the most powerful cartels in the country was a worthy exchange for information extracted from informants like Zambada Niebla.

Meanwhile, some 40,000 Mexican civilians have perished in the U.S.- sponsored crackdown on the drug trade.

In early May, Conroy crunched the numbers from the U.S. State Department's most recent data on military spending for Fiscal Years 2008-2009 and found that, in addition to 177 million dollars worth of defence hardware funnelled to companies in Mexico via private corporations in the U.S., 204 million dollars in arms were also sent across the border.

A history of corruption

This isn't the first time that U.S. agencies have been enmeshed in drug trafficking activities. Official documents and testimonies from the Iran-contra scandal proved that such activities date back at least to the 1980s.

In 1990, then-DEA agents Wayne Schmidt and Hector Berrelez wrote a secret report that referenced the assassination of Mexican journalist Manuel Buendia in 1984.

A well-known columnist, Buendia possessed information about what was believed to be training camp of "Guatemalan guerrillas" in the southeastern state of Veracruz, which in fact turned out to be a breeding ground for mercenaries of the Nicaraguan Contra.

Between 1981 and 1986, during the first five of its eight years in office, Ronald Reagan's Republican administration waged a clandestine war against the Nicaraguan Sandinista regime, led by Daniel Ortega. That campaign was made possible by the financing and training of the Contras, a guerrilla group that was fuelled by profits from the narco- trade.

"In exchange for getting money for the Contra, the Central Intelligence Agency [CIA] created a relationship with the Medellin Cartel and with mid-sized Mexican drug dealers. Thanks to that connection, the Mexicans grew… from being [small-time] sellers, they entered the big cocaine market," Anabel Hernandez, Mexican journalist and author of the recent explosive best-seller 'Los Señores del Narco' (The Drug Lords), told IPS.

In 1977, Miguel Caro, Ernesto Fonseca and Miguel Felix Gallardo, leaders of the Guadalajara Cartel – the seed of the Sinaloa Cartel – were introduced to the Honduran Ramon Mata Ballesteros, the human link with the Colombian drug traffickers.

Together, they began to transport the powder from South America to the U.S., an activity that earned them millions of dollars.

U.K. receives giant Reagan statue to commemorate destructive austerity measures

GlobalIndigo

After various millionaires and billionaires crashed the entire world economy, governments worldwide are imposing “austerity measures” designed to punish impoverished recipients of direct government aid and middle-class public employees for their crimes against the international economic consensus. (“Gubmint too big!!!” -The Economist.) In nations where trade unions are actually a major force for the rights of workers and not a depressing relic, there are massive protests. In Great Britain, a one-day strike brought 750,000 people to the streets. Also, London just got an awesome, brand-new 10-foot-tall statue of Ronald Reagan!

The statue will “stand alongside statues of other American presidents such as Franklin D Roosevelt and Dwight D Eisenhower,” a couple of guys who actually helped the U.K. survive a world war.

The U.K. government didn’t pay for the million-dollar Reagan statue. It’s at the U.S. Embassy, and the Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation footed the bill. But it’s still so poetically apt that we gave them this gift just as the Tory government (which, to be fair, is far to the left of both of our own parties) attempts to install a plan that would have workers contribute more to their pensions while receiving less in return, painted as a necessity in this dire worldwide economic slowdown, which was not actually  caused by the pensions of people who work for a living.

Ronald Reagan was the genius who discovered that there’s no political punishment for slashing taxes on the wealthy, deregulating the massive casino they pretend is a productive financial industry, and then declaring that the “free ride” for poor folk and the publicly employed middle class is over. Because he did hire a couple reasonably responsible people, he was forced to re-raise taxes after his first tax cuts began ballooning the deficit that justified his hard stance against people like air traffic controllers, but his story — that jobs will be created if the wealthy are allowed to do whatever the hell they want, and that the government can’t afford to keep promises made to employees or poor people — never changed. And it influenced right-wing governments eveywhere.

There’s no punishment for blaming a bunch of public employees for government shortfalls and economic downturns caused by millionaires and billionaires, because during such a downturn, all the people whose lives go to hell resent people with safe jobs and good pensions even more than they resent the distant, amorphous rich bankers who caused the problem.

As in America, the U.K.’s opposition party is too spineless and terrified of ancient memories of the ’70s to put forth any  opposing narrative.

You’re welcome, Great Britain!