Showing posts with label Savings and Loan Scandal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Savings and Loan Scandal. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 28, 2011

Bill Black: The Banks Are Still Insolvent, And Obama Is Not Only Covering It Up, He's Taking Credit!

Daily Bail



Bill Black says you're doin' a heck of a job, Mr. President.

---

A look back at a Bill Black op-ed from last Fall. Nothing has changed.

As part of their TARP propaganda tour, Obama officials from Tim Geithner to the president himself keep repeating the same lie statistic -- that solving the financial crisis will cost far less than the 2.5% of GDP it took to clean up after the S&L crisis. In this piece, Bill Black gives withering criticism of Obama for playing extend and pretend with the TBTF banks -- the very same game the S&L regulators played during the 1980's. It didn't end well back then, and it won't end well this time.

Regardless, says Black in a new op-ed, the results, are clear:

For reasons that only Summers, Geithner, and Obama can know, they chose to adopt Pratt's disastrous and dishonest anti-regulatory strategy and parrot his dishonest claims of brilliance and success. Congress passed the Prompt Corrective Action (PCA) law in 1991 for the express purpose of outlawing any repeat of Pratt's refusal to close insolvent banks. Congress, at the behest of the Chamber of Commerce, the American Bankers Association (ABA), and Chairman Bernanke, successfully (and shamefully) extorted the Financial Accounting Standards Board to change the accounting rules so that banks no longer had to recognize losses on their toxic mortgage paper appropriately until they sold the assets.

Covering up the losses had three real (carefully unstated) purposes: (1) permitting evasions of the PCA [Prompt Corrective Action law], (2) allowing the banks to remove themselves from the strictures of the TARP program even if they are, in reality, insolvent, and (3) allowing insolvent and impaired banks to pay their senior executives huge bonuses on the basis of the (fictional) income that results when a bank does not recognize its losses.

The Bush and Obama administrations have consistently refused to apply any of the successful lessons learned in responding to the S&L debacle - even though the response has been praised by experts in public administration and Treasury Secretaries from both parties for decades. Both administrations refused to even discuss the current crisis with the senior S&L regulators that contained that crisis before it caused a recession. Obama thinks his response to the crisis was brilliant because it did not follow the S&L regulators' much more expensive strategy. Obama cited the comparison to the S&L debacle as the most telling demonstration he could make of why his administration deserves praise.

It's a Miracle!

What Obama does not understand is that his "cover up" strategy and his claims of brilliant success are direct steals from Dick Pratt's playbook. Dick Pratt was the top S&L regulator in 1981-83. When he left (to join Merrill Lynch) he claimed that he had contained the crisis through innovative resolution strategies that slashed the average historic costs (from over 20% to less than 5% of the S&L's assets). Pratt's "resolutions" were accounting scams that did not resolve anything. They did, however, transmute real insolvencies into fake assets and create guaranteed (fictional) accounting income. The scam was so crazy that the more insolvent the S&L acquired, the greater the fictional income that the deal created. Pratt did so many of these scam resolutions that they created so much fictional income and capital that the industry reported it had suddenly returned to profitability.

The reality was quite different. There was no miracle, only the cumulative results of multiple accounting scams. Pratt's resolutions did not resolve failed S&Ls. They were still insolvent.

A summary of Black's op-ed from last week:

* Fictional Accounting Allows Insolvent Banks To Pay Billions In Bonuses

* The fraudulent CEOs looted with impunity, were left in power, and were granted their fondest wish when Congress, at the behest of the Chamber of Commerce, Chairman Bernanke, and the bankers' trade associations, successfully extorted the professional Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) to turn the accounting rules into a farce.

* The FASB's new rules allowed the banks (and the Fed, which has taken over a trillion dollars in toxic mortgages as wholly inadequate collateral) to refuse to recognize hundreds of billions of dollars of losses. This accounting scam produces enormous fictional "income" and "capital" at the banks. The fictional income produces real bonuses to the CEOs that make them even wealthier. The fictional bank capital allows the regulators to evade their statutory duties under the Prompt Corrective Action (PCA) law to close the insolvent and failing banks.

Background:

* William Black Calls On FDIC To Seize Bank Of America

* William Black With Dylan Ratigan: "There Is Bank Fraud Everywhere And BERNANKE Is Leading The Cover-Up," PLUS Part 2 Of 'Seize Bank Of America'




Bonus Video: Ratigan with Black and Inside Job Director Charles Ferguson

Click here for Ratigan's complete interview with Charles Ferguson.

* "There have been ZERO criminal referrals."

* “None of that is happening because the people in charge don’t look.”

* “If you looked you would have seen fraud incidence in these mortgages in the 80% range and they could not have been sold.”

* “The real losses are being hidden bby the Fed to the tune of trillions of dollars RIGHT NOW.”

Tuesday, July 5, 2011

U.S. Austerity Measures: Putting the Cart before the Horse

After discovering the first attempt at an on-location promotion of austerity measures in the U.S., one very important element seems to be missing from the conversation. Liability.

Robert Bixby jerks the microphone from Alison McLeod.
McLeod began speaking after the meeting and QnA session
was finished.  The microphone probably belongs to the house
or Giffords' staff.
Arizona's 8th Congressional District is experiencing a temporary power vacuum since the shooting of Gabrielle Giffords last January. Regardless, guests David Walker, CEO of the Comeback America Initiative and Robert Bixby, Director of the Concord Coalition, were comfortable visiting this remote, ambiguous neck of the woods to begin the promotional push for austerity measures aimed at reducing deficit spending and the national debt. One question noticeably absent from this conversation is, "why are they tapping the public citizenry to pay the bill?"

Criminal Recklessness

After the persistent, behind-the-scenes, unceremonious gutting of the U.S. Treasury these last thirty years, there seems to be an assumption that U.S. taxpayers are going to pay for the party. U.S. taxpayers had nothing to do with the illegal wars in Central America, the Savings and Loan bailouts, NAFTA, GATT, the missing trillions from the Pentagon, 9/11, the oil spills, the trillions of dollars for the Middle East adventures and the bank bailouts to cover the phony housing bubble.

Lame Duck Power Structure

The Walker/Bixby team took great pains to describe how this current bankrupt state diminishes the amount of available capital, requires interest payments, reduces flexible spending for new needs and increases the number of fiscal crises. A fairly mild warning compared to seasoned economists predicting a worldwide economic train wreck. Regardless, that's not our problem. It's a situation that must be dealt with by those who have screwed up the country not by the people who were dragged to this point kicking and screaming.

Going Through the Motions

Perhaps the players like Walter and Bixby don't believe they need a consensus or public support. After all, when you look at the list of targets put together in the 256 page Congressional Budget Office Report, you find every last reference and detail thick with this inherent assumption of citizen sacrifice. Our last article posted an account by SPNOW member Lee Stanfield of the heavy handed tactics designed to build a phony consensus. Stanfield teamed up with others in Tucson to develop a handy worksheet entitled: "COUNTERTACTICS FOR ANTI-ACTIVIST PSEUDO PUBLIC MEETINGS".

Giffords' staff worked very hard in conjunction with the suits from out of town for this illusion of austerity enthusiasm. These heavy handed tactics, however, became so painfully obvious to the disgruntled crowd that Giffords' staff didn't bother picking up or recording the responses from each table.

A Restaurant Analogy by Mike Rivero

Probably the most succinct analogy illustrating why the the people should not be charged with feeding our currently bankrupt system is the restaurant analogy from my favorite web author, Mike Rivero of whatreallyhappened.com.  Here is a portion:
"If the proprietor of the restaurant has miscalculated the cost of meeting his agreed-to obligation to the customer [a hamburger for $10.00], is the customer obligated to cover the shortfall? No. The proprietor of the restaurant is responsible for the error, and if he cannot meet his agreed-to obligations for the agreed-upon price, he should declare bankruptcy, go out of business, and make way for a new restaurant with better fiscal sense.

Simple common sense.

Let us imagine for a moment that you live in a nation, and you request some benefits. The government tells you the cost is $1000 for the benefits, and you pay $1000 in taxes for the benefits. You get your benefits. No problems. Well worth the money you paid for them. No complaints.

Then when you have your benefits, the government shows up at your door, apologizes profusely, explains that it underestimated the real cost of providing you with the benefits it agreed to provide and hands you a bill for an additional sum it had to borrow in order to provide the services, plus interest since the start of your use of the benefits. Do you pay it? Of course not. You, the citizen, entered into a verbal contract with the government to provide you with your benefits at the taxes agreed to by all parties prior to the transaction."
The following list below from that Congressional Budget Office Report may be the blueprint for what austerity measures in the United States will actually look like.  As with the WTO Summits from Seattle and Georgia, expect the shipment of stout, less than empathetic police from remote cities flush with overtime pay, coated in Kevlar and wielding consensus-building billy clubs for your curious noggins.

J.T. Waldron