Recently, Facebook has removed the pages of about
50 political activists. Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth
founder Richard Gage lost his page, as did several other activists.
Later, the pages were reactivated.
Several people associated with the alternative news website InfoWars.com also had their pages removed. InfoWars reports,
In September 2011, Infowars reporter Darrin McBreen was
told by Facebook staff not to voice his political opinion on the social
networking website. Responding to comments McBreen had made about
off-grid preppers being treated as criminals, the “Facebook Team” wrote,
“Be careful making about making (sic) political statements on
facebook,” adding, “Facebook is about building relationships not a
platform for your political viewpoint. Don’t antagonize your base. Be
careful and congnizat (sic) of what you are preaching.”
The Facebook purge includes those who have posted pro-Second Amendment statements and/or made comments about the report
made by the Washington Post /CBS News that another gunman had been
arrested in the woods near Sandy Hook Elementary after the shooting.
The office of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth
reports that Mr. Gage has never made any statements about gun ownership
on his page. The AE911 office also confirms that a number of 9/11
activists have been targeted by Facebook.
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth produced a documentary last year, Experts Speak Out, which has found large audiences, particularly through a PBS affiliate.
Consequently, many engineers and building professionals now question
the official story of the collapse of the three World Trade Center
towers.
Infowars reports the following individuals have had their pages deleted or suspended:
Kurt Nimmo (account suspended)
Aaron Dykes (account inactive)
Amber Lyon (account suspended)
Brandon J. Raub (account inactive)
Michael F Rivero (account inactive)
Anthony J Hilder (account inactive)
William Lewis (account inactive)
Richard Gage (account inactive)
William Rodriguez (account inactive)
Infowar Artist (account inactive)
We are Change (account inactive)
Wacboston At Twitter (account inactive)
Michael Murphy Tmp (account inactive)
Robert M Bowman (account inactive)
Peter Dale Scott (account inactive)
Jason Infowars (account inactive)
Mike Skuthan (account inactive)
Packy Savvenas (account inactive)
Sean Wright (account inactive)
Katherine Albrect (account inactive)
Update: As of December 28th, the above pages have been reactivated. Facebook has not issued a statement.
"9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out" is getting public attention and casting doubt on the scientific validity of the U.S. government's investigation into the WTC tragedy. PBS is the first major network to air the program.
Just days away from the 11th anniversary of the World Trade Center tragedy and months away from the U.S. presidential election, a game-changing 9/11 documentary is ranking number three among "most watched" documentaries on PBS and number one among "most shared." Available for free onlineAugust 18th - September 4th, the documentary could have a significant effect on public opinion. [Update: PBS has extended viewing indefinitely.] Both the Republicans and Democrats, as equally staunch defenders of the official story, stand to be affected if the public's suspicion of government corruption grows deeper.
An earlier report on Digital Journal found that the claims made in the documentary can be verified by reading the government reports themselves. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), the government agency charged with the investigation, did not provide any data -- no measurements or estimates -- of the mass or energy that would be required to bring down the buildings in about ten seconds. Normally a scientific report would present all the data that is used to construct a theory. The omission of data is a red flag to anyone familiar with scientific procedure. It appears that the investigators may have intentionally produced reports that the scientific community would reject.
According to the experts appearing in Explosive Evidence, the scientific community did reject the reports immediately, but it has taken a very long time for this message to reach the public. Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, the producers of the documentary, have been trying to educate the public for a number of years. The PBS broadcast of their work represents a major step forward for them.
While most people have probably heard that a scientific investigation has been conducted and that the building collapses were explained, few have probably looked at the NIST reports themselves. Links to the NIST reports can be found in the above mentioned Digital Journalarticle. NIST provides no data whatsoever on the actual collapse sequence itself.
The new attention to the issue could be significant for the U.S. presidential election. Prior to the publication of the reports in 2005 and 2008, almost half the population was suspicious of the official story of 9/11, according to several opinion polls. Since then the 9/11 tragedy has been used to direct the policies that have led to the enormous increases in military spending and to a loss of civil liberties in the U.S. and worldwide.
This is the major press conference that AE911Truth held at the occasion of the World Premiere of their powerful myth-shattering documentary "9/11: Explosive Evidence -- Experts Speak Out" on May 22, 2012 in Beverly Hills, CA. Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth founder, Richard Gage, AIA and AE911Truth supporter and actor, Ed Asner, teamed up to lay into the media in an effort to hold them accountable for their 10-year silence on the subject of the abundant scientific evidence and eyewitness testimony that pulls the rug from under the official story of the destruction of the three World Trade Center towers on 9/11. This new documentary, introduced by Gage, following the press conference hosts 43 technical and building professionals who cite the evidence and call for a new investigation. It also includes 8 psychology professionals who are well versed in the difficult issues that viewers of this film may face when confronting the evidence.
A new 9/11 documentary featuring dozens of experts in architecture, engineering, and other fields has been released and is coming to the Clinton Street Theatre in Portland, OR on Saturday, May 26th at 8:00PM. Confidently contradicting official US government explanations, these experts argue that the World Trade Center Twin Towers and WTC Building 7 (WTC 7) were not brought down on September 11, 2001, by the fires ignited by the jetliner impacts, but rather by explosive controlled demolition. The 43 architects, engineers, physicists, chemists and others interviewed in the film represent more than 14,000 concerned citizens and 1,700 architects and engineers from around the world who have signed a petition demanding a new, independent investigation. The film details scientific forensic evidence that the group claims was omitted or misrepresented by the official reports. Official reports blame the unprecedented destruction of all three modern skyscrapers on fires and on the removal of insulation by the jetliner impacts. No jetliner crashed into WTC 7.
The documentary will be introduced by David Fura, a local supporter of the group that released the film, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth). The film is being introduced in 30 cities on a tour of the US by the film's director/producer, Richard Gage, AIA who also founded and directs the nonprofit organization AE911Truth, based in Berkeley, California.
The 95-minute documentary features cutting-edge forensic evidence from forty-three technical experts, who expose the fraudulence of the NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) reports about the destruction of all three WTC high-rises. These include the third-worst structural failure in modern history: the symmetrical free-fall destruction of 47-story World Trade Center Building 7 on the afternoon of 9/11/01.
The startling conclusions brought forth by these experts have profound implications.
Gage declares, “The official story about the attacks of September 11, 2001, falls apart when you look squarely at the facts, omitted in the official reports, and apply fundamental scientific principles to interpret them. After nearly ten years, don’t we all need and deserve to know the truth?”
According to Gage, the film includes interviews with family members of 9/11 victims, who explain why they are still not happy with the answers they've been given about what really happened on 9/11: "The family members in this film exhort their fellow citizens to join them in seeing what these experts have to say."
Several of the film's experts bear PhD's, including renowned biologist Lynn Margulis, now deceased. Margulis was a National Medal of Science winner who, along with the other experts in this film, describes unscientific aspects of the US government's studies of the engineering failures at the World Trade Center. The complete, symmetrical failure of WTC 7 was especially baffling to engineers at the time. According to experts interviewed in the film, the official reports by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and later by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) assume their own conclusions, exclude relevant evidence, and failed to draw reasonable conclusions from the evidence that was examined. Dr. Margulis for instance discusses how the scientific method should have been applied to the evidence of high-temperature incendiaries found in the WTC dust by an international group of scientists.
Regarding WTC Building 7, materials engineer Kathy McGrade says in the film, "The symmetry is the smoking gun."
Structural engineer Ron Brookman notes: "The destruction of evidence was a criminal act in itself.... It was already being carted away and destroyed when the FEMA investigators got there about a month after September 11."
The cross-country tour began in San Diego and Beverly Hills May 21 and 22 and ends in San Francisco in July 2012.
Pentagon officials recently disclosed to the Associated Press (AP) that they could not find any photo or video evidence to confirm that Al Qaeda leader Osama Bin Laden was killed in the Navy Seal raid in Pakistan a year ago.
AP has submitted more than 20 requests for information surrounding the raid on Bin Laden’s Abbottabad compound to the U.S. Government under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).
In response to the request for visual evidence of Bin Laden’s death, the Pentagon stated that it could not find any pictures or video footage of the raid itself or of Bin Laden’s dead body. It also told AP it could not locate any images of Bin Laden’s body that were taken on the U.S.S. Carl Vinson, the Navy aircraft carrier that reportedly lowered him into the sea after his death.
In addition, the Pentagon admitted that it could not find an autopsy report, death certificate or results of a DNA identification test for Bin Laden, in spite of claims made by President Obama and reported by CBC News that a DNA test was performed.
These admissions follow a related FOIA response by the Department of Defense in February, in which it stated that it had no emails concerning the Bin Laden raid that were sent prior to its execution.
The Atlantic Wire reported in February that the CIA claimed it had visual proof of Bin Laden’s death, but the Pentagon’s admission that it does not have any evidence of this kind still raises significant questions, since its jurisdiction includes the Navy Seals that conducted the raid and the Navy ship that buried Bin Laden at sea.
The UK's Guardian recently interviewed “current and former U.S. and European officials with access to intelligence on Iran,” and concluded that the United States, its European allies, and even Israel, agree that Tehran is probably years away from having a deliverable nuclear warhead.1
Twice in recent weeks, CBC News anchor Peter Mansbridge has closely questioned two leaders who hold a different view.
In a January 18th interview, Prime Minister Stephen Harper told Mansbridge that he thinks that “the evidence is...overwhelming” and that it “is just beyond dispute at this point” that Iran’s purpose is to develop nuclear weapons. When pressed about Iran's insistence that it has no intention to build nuclear weapons, Harper said “I think there is absolutely no doubt they are lying”.2
Harper's claims are all-too-reminiscent of US Former Secretary of State Colin Powell's February, 2003, statement at the UN that, with “facts and conclusions based on solid intelligence”,3 there was no doubt in his mind that Saddam Hussein was working to obtain key components to produce nuclear weapons.
That intelligence has since been exposed as lies. In fact, the Iraqi chemical engineer who perpetrated the false intelligence, Rafid Ahmed Alwan al-Janabi, confessed his lies on British television April 3rd.4
Also troubling is that Harper cited the International Atomic Energy Commission, but in the March 22nd Guardian, the agency’s former director-general, Hans Blix, raised concerns about its recent credibility. The IAEC has been charged with over-reliance on unverified intelligence, and pro-Western bias, since the 2009 arrival of its new chief, Yukiya Amano.
More recently, Harper's conclusion was thrown into question during a CBC News One on One interview with US Defence Secretary Leon Panetta, aired last weekend.
Panetta first stated that the best US intelligence has concluded that Iran has not made the decision to build a nuclear weapon. He went on to say that Iran is involved in providing non-nuclear weapons to terrorist-associated groups outside the country.5
However, when Mansbridge queried whether containment was an effective policy (sealing off the country to prevent weapons exports to outsiders), Panetta then contradicted his own intelligence claim by saying the US was going to apply economic and diplomatic sanctions because "we cannot allow a country that supports terrorism to have a nuclear weapon."
When pushed to justify the sanctions, Panetta played the debate-ending trump card – the supposed threat of Muslim terrorism – the card spawned by 9/11.
Thus ended the Panetta news segment – Mansbridge did not challenge whether hidden, ubiquitous, amorphous terrorism was a factor in the case of Iran.
The time is long overdue for investigative journalists to challenge such references to unsubstantiated terrorism. They can do so with confidence by becoming knowledgeable about the growing body of evidence refuting the official claims about the events of 9/11.
An unprecedented and potentially powerful Canadian initiative is entering a new phase that brings Canada one step closer to re-investigating the events at the World Trade Center on 9/11.
For the first time, the Canadian Parliament will respond, in at least some measure, to the calls for justice and accountability regarding the controlled demolition of the Twin Towers and WTC Building 7
First Steps Completed
On November 11, 2011, the petition for a parliamentary review of the destruction of the three WTC skyscrapers on 9/11 was submitted to the Government of Canada by members of the Canadian 9/11 truth movement. The petition will soon be formally read in Parliament.
It was signed by 1,405 Canadians, and under long standing protocols, a formal response is required within 45 days.
The petition includes specific points of evidence that must be evaluated and addressed in its response. It specifically asks several pointed questions about a range of evidence that has been assembled and validated by the 1,600 strong Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth.
“The forensic evidence includes, but is not limited to:
• Total destruction of all three WTC skyscrapers with pulverization of concrete floors – proceeding symmetrically through the path of the greatest resistance – at nearly free-fall acceleration;
One of the compelling reasons for bringing this petition to the Canadian Government is the death of 24 Canadian citizens on 9/11. While the deaths of the victims in the Twin Towers have been attributed to a fire-induced collapse, the evidence indicates that these buildings were actually destroyed by pre-planted highly energetic incendiaries and explosives.
The petition also explains that Canadian authorities must launch a new investigation because “Canada, now being a partner with the United States of America in the Global War of Terror, therefore has a responsibility to verify the findings of the United States of America 9/11 Commission Report before committing our military and other resources to the conflict.”
As with many other initiatives, the role of AE911Truth in the project is to be available for technical support and to attract publicity via an eight-city speaking tour of Canada – in accordance with our stated mission “to research, compile, and disseminate scientific evidence relative to the destruction of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers, calling for a truly open and independent investigation and supporting others in the pursuit of justice.”
Richard Gage, AIA, and AE911Truth will support the petition effort by giving presentations on the explosive 9/11 evidence in cities across Canada this spring
The Process
This petition project will be followed through the governmental review process using the Access To Information and Privacy (ATIP) system, which is Canada’s Equivalent of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). This way, the public can find out if any violations of trust have occurred. If these tools are organized properly, this process could provide a unique and effective way to investigate the WTC catastrophe.
Engineers for 9/11 Truth, will be returning to Portland . Gage will be delivering the evidence for explosive demolition in the compelling dynamic multi-media presentation “9/11: Blueprint for Truth - Re-Examining the Destruction of the Three World Trade Center Skyscrapers.” The presentation will take place at the Moreland Theater in southeast Portland at 2 pm on Sunday, February 19.
The Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth.org) have examined in great detail the destruction of all three World Trade Center skyscrapers on 9/11 and are calling for a new independent investigation. They have found that the evidence and eyewitness testimony is completely at odds with the official explanation of events. Such an investigation will ensure that the evidence
ignored by prior building reports by governmental agencies like FEMA and NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technologies) is properly considered and that the truth sought by victim family members is finally delivered.
“My introduction to the problems with the official 9/11 narrative occurred several years after 9/11,” says Mr. Gage. “I was listening to the radio and heard Dr. David Ray Griffin describe how over 100 first responders reported explosions on 9/11.” Adds Mr. Gage: “I was shocked that this vital information was not being considered by the official investigations or reported by the media. As I looked into
these matters further, I discovered that this was only the tip of the iceberg.”
The Portland Action Group of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth is sponsoring this event and is proud to carry on the work begun by the family members of the 9/11 victims in seeking a new investigation.
ALSO:
Monday, Feb 20, at PCC Sylvania, Noon-2:30pm
In the Cedar Room of the College Center (CC Building), next to the cafeteria
(12000 SW 49th Ave. Portland, OR 97219)
A guest appearance by San Francisco Bay Area architect Richard Gage, AIA
(Founder of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth)
Co-sponsored by PCC 911 Studies
Local Contact:
David Fura
503-481-8692
PortlandAE911Truth@yahoo.com
www.PortlandAE911Truth.org
After We Are Change Fresno’s founding, we were in contact with several regional and national leaders in the 9/11 Truth movement. Nearly everyone we spoke with warned us that if our group was engaging the public with positive activism, attempted agent provocateur infiltration was essentially guaranteed. One representative we spoke with at 911Truth.org, told us that in her estimation, approximately half of all 9/11 Truth groups around the country had either been completely taken over by government agents, or had dissolved due to the disruptive infighting these agents were able to create with other members.
The warnings we received were more specific in nature rather than general or vague. There was some ‘trust your gut’ and ‘you’ll know one when you see one’ type of advice, but there was also many specific characteristics we were told to watch for. These typical characteristics of agent provocateurs are nicely laid out in an article by Bill Heid, ‘How to Identify an Agent Provocateur’. Besides the fact that they will attempt to get the group to commit illegal acts, (which is the basic definition of an agent provocateur), the following are tell tale signs to watch for as described by Bill Heid:
* Agents will often lack background connections or references. No one in your circles or related groups will know them.
* Agents try to keep discussions and action unproductive and still. They’ll spend plenty of time debating issues, with little action. They focus on ideas over people.
* They tend to create messes in groups and between group members. They leave chaos in their wake.
* They tend to gravitate toward people in the group who are dissatisfied. Once relationships with those folks grow, the dissatisfaction spreads.
* Some agents have been former prisoners who do this work as part of a deal. These folks tend to jump from organization to organization in a relatively short time.
* Agents don’t have known sources of income. They might have a job that doesn’t match their spending or claim their money comes from prior savings.
* They tend to provide gifts for key figures at first. This helps them build trust with the group.
* When confronted, they will get defensive and start making their own accusations.
* They act like zealots, but they don’t have the fruit of it. They have passion but don’t truly care.
Kenn Herman, Incident #1
On the evening of Monday, June 15, 2009, We Are Change Fresno had its second official meeting at a Starbucks in Clovis. Although it was only our second meeting, we had already been accomplishing much, as mentioned above. At this meeting, a man named Kenn Herman (a.k.a. Elthadiya) attended and wasted no time whatsoever in displaying classic agent provocateur behavior. Some of what can be recalled about what he did and said are below:
* Suggested we start a violent revolution.
* Suggested we use Che Guevara as our model.
* Suggested we get guns and start shooting people.
* Suggested we slash tires of police cars.
* Suggested we graffiti our messages on other people’s property.
* Frequently brought up ‘fringe’ topics outside the typical scope of We Are Change to divert the discussion.
* Felt the need to explain why his hair was recently dyed a color that looked unnatural. He claimed it was from a low quality brand of chlorine he used in his swimming pool.
* Lied about how he found out about the meeting.
* He also brought a high powered camera with him and asked a woman he was sitting next to to walk around the group and take pictures of everyone for his MySpace account – a MySpace account which did not exist.
* When we explained to him why some people might be uncomfortable with him photographing us, he was very apologetic and said he would delete the pictures when he got home. When pressed to delete them in our presence, his demeanor completely changed, accusing us of being an anti-freedom group trying to encroach on his freedom.
* When we told him we basically knew who he worked for, he quickly walked away yelling at us that he’d remember our faces, strangely not denying our assertion.
* Once confronted, he never returned and also deleted his Meetup account.
While it cannot be known for an absolute 100% certainty that Kenn Herman was an agent provocateur, it can be determined that he has a criminal record which includes assault with a deadly weapon and theft, (Fresno County case # M98903999-1.) This suggests the possibility that he might have been a criminal informant working for law enforcement, with attempting to provocateur our group as one of his assignments.
This incident was also discussed on the Alex Jones Show on July 3, 2009. The clip is below.
James Bourne, Incident #2
More recently, on Friday, September 9, 2011, a new member joined We Are Change Fresno through the online Meetup site. His name was James Bourne, which is fairly comical considering the resemblance to the name of the secret agent Jason Bourne of the Bourne Trilogy movies. After joining, he immediately began an online discussion thread which he titled, ‘Using riots to get the word across?’ During this discussion, he repeatedly attempted to lead We Are Change Fresno into violence and criminal behavior at an upcoming street action that was on the tenth anniversary of 9/11. Here’s a summary of his behavior and suggestions:
* Suggested we revolt against our local government.
* Suggested we ‘stage’ riots. [Note: I find it odd he used the term 'stage'.]
* Suggested we march with the purpose of blocking traffic.
* Suggested we ‘go extreme’.
* Suggested we cross the street when the lights turn red.
* Suggested bringing bricks.
* Suggested bringing baseball bats.
* Wanted to bring matching t-shirts for us to wear. (Who knows what was on the shirts?)
* Wanted to bring signs of his own design for us to hold. (Who knows what was on the signs?)
After he started making such suggestions, it was made known to him that if he showed up at the street action, the police would be waiting for him and we would videotape the ordeal to put on YouTube. This threat, which was made good on by one of our members calling Fresno PD, prevented him from showing up and disrupting the street action. Strangely, afterwards he claimed he was hiding out on the other side of the street at a fast food restaurant where he witnessed the police presence, and took photos of us. Shortly thereafter he was kicked out of the We Are Change Fresno Meetup group, and then he immediately deleted his account.
With law enforcement sending in undercover police at local lectures on veganism, to the well publicized infiltration of Peace Fresno by law enforcement, it’s not too hard to fathom that the government would want to disrupt a local activist group that is critical of the official story of September 11th, 2001. These incidents are good lessons to remind us to remain peaceful, but also to take direct action at confronting all individuals who attempt to provoke any activist group into committing acts of violence and other crimes. Peace out!
(LETHRIDGE, Alberta) - Pacifica and the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation have joined forces in featuring Jonathan Kay in 9/11/11 coverage aimed at renewing the psychological warfare essential to the invasions, torture, Genocide, illegal occupations and Islamophobia characterizing the 9/11 wars.
Jonathan Kay was a featured guest highlighted in the network coverage of the tenth anniversary of 9/11 as broadcast by both Pacifica Radio in the United States and the English-language radio division of the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. Kay wrote for Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation a hate-inspired, tenth-anniversary text claiming that those engaged in seeking answers for the copious unanswered questions concerning 9/11 are engaged in “absolving” all Muslims collectively of a “terrible crime.” (p. 167)
Kay’s diatribe was funded by a prominent Israeli-based think tank whose leadership comes largely from the Project for the New American Century. PNAC is the think tank which observed in 2000 that its ambitious program of military expansion and invasions could not be met without a “catalyzing event” like a new Pearl Harbor. Entitled Among the Truthers, Kay diverts attention away from the evidence of what did and did not happen on 9/11. Instead Kay appoints himself as a psycho-anthropologist in pursuit of what this war promoter and Isamophobe describes as “the growing conspiracist underground.”
In his 9/11/11 coverage Michael Enright, host of CBC Radio’s flag ship show, Sunday Morning, demeaned on air his old colleague, Barrie Zwicker. Zwicker and Enright worked together for many years as reporters at The Globe and Mail, the main competitor in Canada of Kay’s National Post. Zwicker is the author of Towers of Deception: The Media Cover-Up of 9/11. As his wonkey subtitle proclaims, Kay equates even the most accomplished of those engaged in the quest for 9/11 truth, investigators like Zwicker as well as Professor David Ray Griffin, with “Birthers, Armageddonites, Vaccine Hysterics, Hollywood Know-Nothings and Internet Addicts.”
Aged 77, the fit, mentally-agile Zwicker was a guest earlier today on Michael Enright’s program. The struggling host could not come anywhere close to keeping up with Zwicker. Instead Enright displayed an ignorance of his subject matter unbefitting of a broadcaster holding a high level of public trust in Canada’s Crown-owned agency. Like the CBC, the Pacifica stations in the United States have frequently featured Kay as an expert commentator on 9/11. While the CBC did not broach the subject of 9/11 skepticism in its 9/11/11 coverage, at least Pacifica did include in its tenth-anniversary broadcast the perspectives of, for instance, architect Richard Gage and University of Copenhagen Chemistry Professor, Niels Harrit. Both educators are highly critical of the official conspiracy theory of 9/11.
First, the initial article containing my initial response was mixing Pilots for 9/11 Truth references in with the no plane holographic imagery references. That's like mixing cheap ketchup with crawfish etouffee! I don't take issue with information posted on http://pilotsfor911truth.org, but I am also not familiar with any member of Pilots for 9/11 Truth that subscribes to the "no plane theory".
In the paragraph underneath the heading "Pilots for 9/11 Truth", you ask "If there were no planes, what happened?" I see Pilots for 9/11 Truth refuting airspeeds, flight data, pilot skill, flight lists and cell technology.but I haven't found Pilots for 9/11 Truth taking planes completely out of the equation. Through Operation Home Run, the planes did not need to be modified to be flown remotely and I suspect Dov Zakheim had a hand in this technology, although a real investigation may confirm or deny this. Concerning the Pentagon, there is a lot of suspicion and strong circumstantial evidence refuting the official story. In addition, Pilots for 9/11 Truth's analysis of the flight data recorder goes further and indeed places the plane well above the Pentagon with two independent altitude readings (both Doppler and barometric). Jeffrey Latas, an ex Gulf war fighter pilot, commercial pilot and a member of Pilots for 9/11 Truth, confirms the flight data analysis, but is not entirely convinced himself about the idea that no jet hit the Pentagon. I do not believe Latas is compromised over the issue of 9/11. Obviously, there needs to be a thorough investigation of this theater of 9/11, but it's close to impossible to avoid speculation. This potential pitfall seems to be exacerbated by the FBI's confiscation of 80 or more odd recordings from different security cameras around the area.
I view the Pentagon as a potential honeypot propaganda tactic that attracts as many bees to the hive as possible before destroying the nest. Here, the Pentagon can simply pull or modify evidence they are in control of and use it to discredit (justified or not) the whole movement dealing with all theaters of 9/11. Thankfully, we have New York. As you state in your lectures, it seems like the establishment is asking us not to believe "our own lying eyes".
The following three conditions cannot be explained without explosives:
1. Molten iron in the basements of all three buildings.
2. The complete annihilation of all three buildings.
3. The rate of which all three buildings collapse while they are being destroyed.
It has been demonstrated time and again that the establishment has nowhere to go with this. Presenting these three basic items is the equivalent of placing your hands onto the neck of the establishment and squeezing. They are stuck. The more they dispute it, the worse it gets for them. Instead, trade groups are reduced to committing libel and slander by accusing folks like Richard Gage of anti-Semitism. That means Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth are winning - and not the "Charlie Sheen" kind of winning.
All that is left for the establishment shills is deflection. Occupy peoples' time and attention with something like the "no plane theory". Perfect Cass Sunstein material.
In Portland, all of this no plane hologram speculation seems to center around a movie called "September Clues", which is the strongest influence among the no planers. This 90 minute film suggesting holographic imagery, "September Clues", places a great deal of emphasis on issues of timing, pixellation, audio discrepancies, camera angles, building perspectives, lower thirds station I.D.'s, silhouettes, auto-focus, reflections and protruding nose cones.
I already want my time back.
"September Clues" insists that news correspondents on the ground in New York needed to have seen the planes' impacts in order for us all to believe the planes hit the buildings. To be fair, I should mention that it looks like no on-site correspondent witnessed the actual impact of the planes. Every time reporters refer to an explosion, "Clues" cuts to giddy text over pastel colors declaring a moment of deception.
The maker of this film did not like seeing the nose cone popping out of the other side of the building. As the plane explodes with impact, you see all or part of the nose cone of the jet protrude through the other side of the building before it is consumed by the explosion. Apparently, the idea that the cone made it through the building to the other side is "monstrous video trickery". Everyone is supposed to assume that this is impossible. Like there is no way a vertical portion of the cone could make it past the 48 steel beams before exploding from the impact.
What does the editor of this movie do with this image of the emerging nose cone? Smooth out its pixels. Every frame of video footage only has so much information. There are only so many pixels. Bitmap software like photoshop is often tapped to remove the "video look" of a still video frame by smoothing out the pixels. They grab an earlier frame of an unmolested jet nose cone and superimpose it over the part of the nose cone that may have made it through the building. The protruding nose cone is slightly wider, a lot smoother, but matching! It's the fact that they match that we are supposed to realize the video-trickery of it all.
Notice the similar, frumpy, hackneyed tactics by those professionals protecting the official story of 9/11. No attempt to address or dispute the evidence presented by architect Richard Gage, but instead an immediate accusation of being "anti-semitic". The lady doth protest too much. Who instructed the British RIBA and other trade groups to use the tactic of slandering and libeling Richard Gage, AIA instead of using their expertise to refute Gage's findings?
This is a clear indication that they cannot refute Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, regardless of any spin to come out of the so-called debunkers, Honest assessments by outside observers indicate that Gage has scored a substantial victory for the 9/11 Truth movement.
Here is a great example by 9/11 Truth advocate and artist, Scootle Royal (Wake Up American Slobs).
It seems the heads of the Britain and America's top architectural organizations are annoyed that Gage got to talk at the Royal Institute of British Architects, accusing him of using RIBA's name to give credibility to a 'bonkers' conspiracy theory. The Randi-crowd are of course using this fact to argue that Gage is crazy.
I live in Wiltshire, which is a four hour, sixty pound train journey via multiple changes and a tube ride away from Cambridge, but only 45 minutes away from Bristol. So while I couldn't attend Gage's talk at Cambridge University last saturday, I was able to see him in Bristol on tuesday. I had intended to stick around meet him afterwards but the Q&A dragged on too long and I didn't want to miss the last train home so I had to leave early. Anyway, I can assure you there was no 'conspiracy theory' in his presentation. In fact he's even taken out Larry Silverstein's 'pull it' comment. When asked about this in the Q&A he said he took it out because he was fed up with arguing with people over what 'pull it' meant, prefering instead to stick to the science.
Now assuming the presentation I saw was the same as the one given to RIBA in London, I know David Aaronovitch is talking crap when he says "What they mean is that George Bush and the Zionists brought down the towers. The RIBA let itself out to a conspiracy theory organisation whose theories are utterly insane."
The only theory that is utterly insane is NIST's thermal expansion theory. At one point in the presentation I saw, after outlining the thermal expansion theory, Gage said something like "There are so many things wrong with this, but for the sake of time I will only list twelve!" and then went on a rapid fire tirade simply on why the idea of heated floor beams remaining rigid, breaking numerous bolts and studs in unison and pushing against a girder, instead of just sagging, is ludicrous. If Aaronovitch, who attended the RIBA lecture, accepts the official story of 9/11, then that is what he endorses!
ED Note: Should Richard Gage speak more about implications of his findings or continue to refrain from speculating about the events that generated the evidence he has examined? The hysterics behind this latest hit piece show desperation on behalf of the 9/11 apologists and an attempt to turn sound scientific research into a punchline of a joke. Would this fire ignited by willful ignorance be cooled by discussing the implications of what ae911truth.org has found?
Institute reviews policy after controversial event booked by Zaha Hadid Architects associate
The RIBA is reviewing its policy on hiring out 66 Portland Place following a storm of criticism over its hosting of a group claiming that New York’s Twin Towers were brought down through a controlled explosion.
Leading architects on both sides of the Atlantic hit out at the institute this week after American architect Richard Gage, part of the group Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, delivered a lecture at RIBA HQ on Monday night.
The venue was booked by fellow American and RIBA member Craig Phillip Kiner, an associate at Zaha Hadid Architects.
Gage claims that the fires caused by the impact of the two jets flown into the World Trade Centre on September 11, 2001, could not have been sufficient to make the steel structure of the towers collapse, and he questions the collapse of World Trade Centre 7, a nearby 47-storey building which was not hit by an aircraft.
At the age of 78, Dick Gregory has not slowed down in his quest to expose injustice and stand up for the truth
Many people know Dick Gregory as a luminary of the American civil rights movement, who partnered with Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. and other activists to promote racial equality and an end to the Vietnam War. Others recognize him as a popular comedian, whose humorous acts have earned him international renown. Gregory has been lauded by presidents and honored by Hollywood actors over his distinguished and diverse career… but he has set all of those accolades aside to support the work of the 9/11 truth movement – and specifically the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. We recently caught up with him to discuss the impact of this potentially historic alliance.
For Gregory, awareness of the logical fallacies behind the official 9/11 story came early. “I was suspicious of 9/11 from day one,” Gregory recalled. “The way the Twin Towers and Building 7 fell just didn’t make any sense.”
Over the years, Gregory has independently researched the anomalies that contradict the official explanation of the WTC catastrophe, but he was not aware of a group of technical professionals that could confirm his suspicions. That changed on September 9, 2010, when he attended the press conference held by AE911Truth at the National Press Club in Washington, DC. Gregory sat in astonishment as Gage and other experts described the compelling case for controlled demolition.
“I was so amazed, because I had never seen the scientific evidence put together like that,” Gregory said.
Motivated by the work of AE911Truth, Gregory announced to the guests and media in attendance that he would be embarking on a two-year solid food fast for 9/11 Truth. “It was such a blessing to see you all take a stand that day,” Gregory explained, “and I wanted to add positive energy to your effort.”
Gregory’s declaration was so moving that Gage was overwhelmed with gratitude. “I was deeply humbled and honored to have a civil rights icon like Dick Gregory support AE911Truth directly and with such a strong statement of action,” Gage said afterward.
Richard Gage, AIA, and others listen
intently as Dick Gregory proclaims his
support for AE911Truth at the National
Press Club in Washington DC
Those who may be concerned about the health effects of Gregory’s decision need not worry. As a vegetarian and nutritionist, he has maintained a minimalist diet for decades and performed hunger strikes for other controversial issues. When asked what his doctor thought about the fast, Gregory replied, “He’s been dead for 30 years.” We hope that his sense of humor follows him into the 9/11 activist work. We need it.
A few days later, on September 11, Gregory followed up by moderating a panel discussion in the “How the World Changed after 9/11” seminar in New York City, and since then, the response he has received from friends and colleagues has been tremendous.
“People have told me that they knew something was wrong with the official 9/11 story, but they didn’t know what to do,” he said. “Now they feel empowered by my decision to fast for 9/11 Truth.”
Whether he is discussing strategy with Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. or fasting for 9/11 Truth, Dick Gregory excels at shining light upon the oppression of humanity
Even though Gregory has been a peaceful crusader for many causes, he believes the technical focus that AE911Truth has maintained will allow it to withstand the scrutiny and condemnation that has frustrated other activist groups. “The difference here is that mathematics is the same throughout the world,” Gregory said. “When architects and engineers see your research, it will make sense to them. Now those who feel inspired to share the truth with others have talking points that are backed by hard science and expert analysis.”
Gregory also sees potential in bringing the 9/11: Blueprint for Truth DVD to places of worship. “The churches of America are a strong force,” he explained, “and if we reach out to them with this kind of information, it will make a big difference.”
The continued collaboration between AE911Truth and Dick Gregory is expected to yield positive results in the near future. “We look forward to working with Dick on some important outreach projects in 2011,” Gage revealed.
Gregory expressed a similar optimism about the potential effect of upcoming events: “I hope my endeavors will bring greater visibility to AE911Truth and the explosive evidence that so many have yet to see.”
By stepping forward and taking decisive action in his own unique way, Gregory has reminded us that there are a variety of paths anyone can take to contribute to the push for an independent 9/11 investigation. Whether this means volunteering, distributing brochures, becoming a sustaining supporter of AE911Truth, or making personal sacrifices as an example to others, we all have the opportunity to create a distinctive impact. Just as it took thousands of workers with different skills to construct the WTC skyscrapers, it will take the combined efforts of prominent individuals and average citizens to awaken our fellow citizens to the truth about what really brought those buildings down – and secure justice for all of us that are so deeply affected.
Lehigh Valley, PA - On Saturday, July 3, 2010, the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth petition, which demands Congress start a new and independent investigation into 9/11, hit the 10,000 signers mark.
Such an historic milestone for liberty could not have occured at a more fitting time than the 4th of July, a time when Americans take pause to celebrate their liberty and reflect on the form of government that guarantees such freedom.
A perfect time to raise an eyebrow at the 9/11 investigation that continually tells us, even to this day, that we must fight more wars and give up more personal liberties.
And, Lehigh Valley locals are, indeed, beginning to speak out about it.
Meet petition signer Lori McFerran, who says she lives "in a small town in eastern Pennsylvania with [her] husband." Mrs. McFerran writes of herself in her personal description statement, "I am an editor at a daily newspaper in Allentown, Pa., and have almost 30 years' experience as a journalist and writer."
Mrs. McFerran isn't so sure the 9/11 Commission got it right, stating in her petition, "After hearing the evidence presented by Richard Gage (I listened to the youtube video and heard him speak on Coast to Coast on Tuesday, June 10), I am sufficiently suspicious of the account that was presented by the media about what happened at the World Trade Center in 2001. I fully support a complete and UNBIASED investigation into the events and a thorough scientific evaluation of the evidence at the site."
The emphasis by Mrs. McFerran that the new 9/11 investigation needs to be unbiased was shared by another local, a Mr. Larry A. Hill of Northampton.
Mr. Hill stated in his petition:
"I have a Bachelor of Arts in History from Penn State University, graduated with highest distinction (top 2%) with a GPA of 3.88. I am a self-taught database programmer by profession. In my studies of History, I reject most, if not all popular conspiracy theories.
I accepted the government explanation of the WTC towers for years. When I saw the AE911Truth video, I was convinced that we were NOT told anywhere near the entire truth about this event.
A truly complete and INDEPENDENT investigation must be done. No one with direct ties to the US government should be involved. Until this happens, trust in our government and the ability of representative democracy to protect us is eroded and undermined."
One avenue of investigation not pursued by the 9/11 Commission was the possible use of explosives in bringing down any or all of the World Trade Center towers on 9/11/01. Bethlehem resident Robert D. Grim writes in his petition statement that evidence of controlled demolitions is opening his eyes, stating:
"Though not an architect or engineer, I am a physics buff. I have a solid understanding of the laws that govern the physical universe, and am also well versed in construction methods.
I was a senior in high school when the towers collapsed. I didn't question anything at first, but I did see the resemblance between the WTC and controlled demolitions. I began questioning the event when a friend who had seen the film "Fahrenheit 9/11" told me about the theory of controlled demolition. Since then, nearly every piece of evidence that I've seen has supported that theory. I want truth!!!!"
On this 4th of July, with now 10,000 signatures officially on the A&E petition, there is truly hope that such a new and impartial investigation might be acheived, the need of which having been attested to locally on the A&E petition by Lehigh Valley petition signers such as McFerran, Hill, and Grim.
The 10,000 figure was reached by adding together the official figures given on the A&E website on Saturday, July 3rd. An official figure of 1218 was given for "architects and engineers," and an official figure of 8,787 for "other supporters" on the same day. Thus, as of July 3rd, there were 10,005 total signers, according to figures posted at the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth's official website.
Lehigh Valley residents are reminded that the A&E petition "is open to everyone," according to the A&E official website. Therefore, a person need not be either an architect or an engineer in order to sign the petition. And, indeed, everyone is encouraged to sign.
For more information about the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth petition, readers are referred to the official website, cms.ae911truth.org.
Straight from the airport, Richard Gage, AIA, stops by KJLL 1330AM the JOLT to interview with "The Baron", Chuck Aubrey on his Gnosis Radio program - June 26th, 2010.
Fatally Flawed: The Pursuit of Justice in a Suspicious Election
Voices of Opposition
Opposition to War, Racism and Oppression.
New Additions
All Items Produced In House
The World Reacts...
Click Picture
See Hillary Clinton Make Fun of Gaddafi's Murder
Here is Israel's Crap Treatment of an American Jew
People participate in movements when that particular movement
(1) meets their concrete and tangible needs, (2) offers individuals real experiences in the movement's outcome (3) provides a sense of community, (4) makes available ongoing education and skills training and (5) shows direct and effective ways for people to take further action.
A loose interpretation of a message sent on Sunday, October 4th, 2009 by the Program on Corporations, Law & Democracy
A worker walks out of a factory building outfitted with nets, installed to prevent workers from jumping to their deaths, at a Foxconn factory, in Langfang, Hebei Province August 3, 2010. There have been nearly a dozen suicides at Foxconn plants around China this year alone, prompting calls for investigations into poor working conditions at the plants that make parts for customers such as Apple, HP and Dell. (REUTERS/Jason Lee) #
You can't have peace for the sake of peace. Peace is a consequence of an equitable arrangement.
Welcome to 9-11 Movies
-
The idea behind this site is to present the most rudimentary, simplified,
common-sense information about the anomalies that fuel our doubts about the
offic...
Never forget and never give up.
-
Dear friends and colleagues,
Tomorrow is another anniversary of the 9/11 crimes. It's now 23 years!
I've been seeking the truth for 21 of those years and...
The Storm
-
VIA From The Trenches World Report
A storm is headed in our direction, and it’s going to shower Americans with
trauma, misery, and desperation. It’s all pa...
US’s Saudi Oil Deal from Win-Win to Mega-Lose
-
By F. William Engdahl Who would’ve thought it would come to this? Certainly
not the Obama Administration, and their brilliant geo-political think-tank
neo-...
FAREWELL …… BUT HOPEFULLY NOT FOREVER
-
Unfortunately WordPress has changed its format making it almost impossible
for me to continue posting on this Blog. Therefore, I am bidding farewell
to m...
10 Most Sought-After Bartering Items in Venezuela
-
10 Most Sought-After Bartering Items in Venezuela
By Maybell Nieves
October 14, 2019 08:13
About 50 years ago, Venezuela was one of the most stable cou...
Palestinian Women – One for All, All for One
-
Honouring All Palestinian Women by Honouring Three: Hanin Zoabi, Ahed
Tamimi, Samah Sabawi Vacy Vlazna “Palestinian women have always stood side
by side ...
#MorningMonarchy: July 28, 2026
-
City managers, next level pinball and golf courses vs data centers + this
day in history w/Tor created for spying and our song of the day by The
Nation Of ...
Reframing AI: Human Creativity as Resistance
-
On this episode of the Project Censored Show, cohost Eleanor Goldfield sits
down with Heidi Lim from AI Resist List to discuss reframing AI, and the
poss...
My Farewell Announcement
-
Cancel PayPal Subscription To cancel your Newsbud membership recurring
subscription through PayPal, simply cancel your PayPal recurring payment
account and...
Episode 506 – They Don’t Want You To Read…
-
We have reached the end of the Age of Reading and started our descent down
the slippery slope of digital distraction toward a post-literate future.
But wha...
Essiac
-
Elaine Alexander: Dr. Brusch have you studied Essiac's effect on cancer
patients under controlled conditions at your clinic?
Dr. Brusch: Yes I have!
Elai...
THE PEOPLE VS THE STATE OF ILLUSION
-
The People Vs The State Of Illusion, by Austin Vickers, is a documentary,
much in the same style as films such as The Secret, What the Bleep Do We
Know, ...
Recently, Facebook has removed the pages of about
50 political activists. Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth
founder Richard Gage lost his page, as did several other activists.
Later, the pages were reactivated.
At the age of 78, Dick Gregory has not slowed down in his quest to expose injustice and stand up for the truth 
Whether he is discussing strategy with Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. or fasting for 9/11 Truth, Dick Gregory excels at shining light upon the oppression of humanity 
Posts
