Showing posts with label Vietnam. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Vietnam. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 19, 2012

The cruel reality is that we've lost in Afghanistan. So why are we still sacrificing our young men?


Max Hastings

Almost 40 years ago, as a young correspondent in Vietnam, I found myself aboard a vast U.S. transport plane, travelling back to Saigon, after  reporting on a battle in the Central Highlands.

The only other passenger beside our TV crew was an American sergeant in a green body-bag, on his way home for burial with his possessions — hi-fi, guitar and suchlike — stacked sadly beside him.

I spent much of that long ride through the darkness thinking about the wretchedness of losing one’s life in the final convulsions of a dying war.

Private Thomas Wroe
Sergeant Gareth Thursby

Killed: Sergeant Gareth Thursby (left) and Private Thomas Wroe (right) 
were shot by a man in Afghan Police uniform on Saturday

It seems especially futile to go when everyone knows you have given your life for nothing.

Everyone knew that the bad guys were going to win in Vietnam, and so they did.

For people like me who have been there before, it becomes an especially melancholy business to watch the last act of the Western campaign  in Afghanistan starting  to unfold.

On Saturday, Sergeant Gareth Thursby and Private Tom Wroe were shot dead by a supposed comrade in arms — an Afghan.

Their deaths brought to 51 the total of Nato soldiers killed so far this year by Afghans wearing the uniforms of government soldiers or police.

One in five British fatalities in Helmand this year has been so-called ‘green-on-blues’— shootings by our allies rather than our enemies.

The result of this carnage — friendly fire on a shocking scale — is that Nato headquarters in Kabul yesterday announced that routine joint patrolling by Western and Afghan troops will no longer take place. Some pairings will be authorised on a case-by-case basis — which presumably means when commanders think they can trust specific Afghans. But the general rule will be that joint operations will happen only on battalion scale, or bigger.

Untrustworthy: After 51 'green-on-blue' killings so far this year, NATO has called an end to joint patrols with Afghan forces
Untrustworthy: After 51 'green-on-blue' killings so far this year,
NATO has called an end to joint patrols with Afghan forces

This decision had become inevitable.

The morale of American, British and other Western troops has suffered severely from having to go out to fight the Taliban accompanied by Afghans who might at any moment empty an AK-47 automatic rifle magazines into their backs. Four Americans died at the weekend in this fashion, as well as the two British soldiers.

The new dispensation makes a mockery of Nato’s strategy. This requires its men to work in partnership with local security forces, to train them to take over when Western troops go home in 2014.
Nato commanders are said to be intensely frustrated that the Afghan government is failing to protect its allies from treachery, above all by effective screening of its recruits.

It seems absurd to blame the regime of the West’s puppet, President Hamid Karzai, however. This is a ramshackle government amid a society stuck in a time-warp, centuries behind our own, lacking the means or will to run a proper army or police. 

Of course, some Afghans in uniform are brave, effective, honest and loyal. They want to help to move their country into the 21st century, to save it from the Taliban’s committed medievalism.

Carnage: It is unlikely that President Hamid Karzai's corrupt and incompetent, but cooperative, government will outlast the NATO withdrawal
Carnage: It is unlikely that President Hamid Karzai's corrupt and incompetent, but cooperative, government will outlast the NATO withdrawal

Unfortunately, for every one like that, there are 20 Afghans who have put on government uniforms only for the money. They have spent their entire lives in a warlord society, where betrayal and corruption are endemic. Afghans are pragmatists: they back the people most likely to run the place in the future.

Friday, April 20, 2012

‘Several drunk troops behind bloodbath, laughed on shooting-spree, burned corpses’

Russia Today


Gruesome new details are surfacing after 16 Afghan villagers including nine children were shot in their houses by at least one US serviceman. Witnesses to the atrocity now say that several drunken American soldiers were involved.

­Neighbors at the village where the killings took place said they were awoken past midnight by crackling gunfire:

"They were all drunk and shooting all over the place," Reuters cites Agha Lala, a villager in Kandahar's Panjwayi district.

Lala's neighbor Haji Samad lost all of his 11 relatives in the rampage, including children and grandchildren. He claims Marines “poured chemicals over their dead bodies and burned them.”

Twenty-year-old Jan Agha says the gunfire “shook him out of bed.” He was in the epicenter of the horrible shooting, witnessing his father shot as the latter peered out of a window to see what was going on.

"The Americans stayed in our house for a while. I was very scared," the young man told reporters.

Lying on a floor, Agha says, he pretended to be dead.

Monday, January 16, 2012

Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence

This is Martin Luthar King Jr.'s speech, "Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence," made one year before his murder. 



Part 2




Friday, November 18, 2011

Obama moves to legalize cluster munitions

World Socialist Website

The Obama Administration is pushing to allow the use of a weapon prohibited by an international treaty because of its indiscriminate killing and maiming of civilians, particularly children. The US is seeking clearance for all cluster munitions made after 1980 even though the weapons are currently banned by 111 states that have agreed to the Convention on Cluster Munitions (CCM).

Cluster bombs 
The BLU-97 is a US bomblet used Iraq, Afghanistan, Yugoslavia, and Yemen. The yellow clylinder explodes into fragments, while a metal cone on the inside forms into a projectile that can pierce tank armor. In Afghanistan, these weapons were dropped at the same time as yellow food rations. Civilians picked up the yellow bomblet duds in error, causing grievous injury and death.
The anti-personnel weapon is designed to inflict mass casualties. Cluster bombs and artillery shells are filled with hundreds of even thousands of “bomblets,” which disperse at random, and on impact, explode into thousands of projectiles that rip through bodies and structures. Perhaps most maliciously, they have a very high failure rate, which leaves countless duds scattered across a landscape, liable to explode at the slightest touch.

The 2011 Cluster Munition Monitor estimates the global total of cluster munition casualties in the last half-century is between 20,000 and 54,000. The vast majority of victims were affected after a conflict had ended. The munitions are sometimes brightly colored and can be mistaken for toys, leading to horrific deaths and injuries among children.

The broader treaty on arms control, the UN Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW), bans such weapons as mines and incendiary devices, but as of yet has not prohibited cluster munitions. Negotiations are underway in Geneva on this subject, after years of obstruction from the major users and producers of cluster munitions—Russia, China, and above all the United States.

cluster grenade 
This US bomblet was used by the hundreds of millions in southeast Asia, and millions of duds continue to plague the population forty years after the conflict. The closeup on right shows metal balls cast into the shell that become a maelstrom of molten-hot projectiles on impact, specifically designed to maximize injury to humans.
The failure of the CCW treaty to address cluster munitions prompted the creation of the CCM as a separate treaty. It went into force in August, 2010, obligating over 60 countries that have ratified the treaty to destroy their stockpiles and prevent usage or sale of the weapons.


The United States is by far the largest historical user and stockpiler of cluster weapons, followed by Israel. The US and Israel both refused to join the Convention on Cluster Munitions. The same is the case for other large producers and stockpilers, such Russia, China, India, Pakistan and Brazil.

Although the US is not a member, the Obama Administration is now leading an effort to invalidate what modest effect the CCM treaty has had. It has proposed a treaty, as part of the CCW, which would allow the use of all cluster munitions made after 1980 for twelve years after the treaty comes into force. This covers practically all the stockpiles of cluster munitions, as weapons older than 1980 are past their service life anyway. Moreover, all recent usage of the weapons has been with models made after 1980.

Friday, November 4, 2011

China-US Energy Geopolitics: The Battle for Oil in the South China Sea

Global Research
Michel Chossudovsky

A new area of potential confrontation is developing between China and the U.S. According to reports, Exxon Mobil which has acquired exploration and production rights from Vietnam has discovered substantial gas reserves in the South China Sea  off the coast of North Vietnam.

"U.S. oil company ExxonMobil is reporting a "potentially significant" gas discovery off the coast of Vietnam, stating in a press release, "We can confirm ExxonMobil Exploration and Production Vietnam Limited drilled its second exploration well offshore Danang in August 2011 and encountered hydrocarbons." (See John C.K. Daly, Apocalypse Redux? U.S. Natural Gas Find off Vietnam Could Raise Tensions with China,  http://oilprice.com )

It is important to note that  these off-shore reserves are located between the North Vietnam coastline and China's Hainan island in an area of disputed jurisdiction between Vietnam and China. (see map above) The contested area is made up of blocks 117, 118 and 119, which according to Hanoi fall  within the 200-mile exclusive economic zone under international maritime law (Ibid)

On October 31, following the ExxonMobil discovery announcement, China responded by warning foreign companies not to meddle  "in areas also claimed by China." ( China again warns foreign oil firms on South China Sea exploration | Reuters, October 31, 2011)

"We hope foreign companies do not get involved in disputed waters for oil and gas exploration and development. This position has been consistent," Hong said, when asked whether China plans to ask Exxon Mobil to withdraw from its oil and gas deal with Vietnam.

Friday, October 21, 2011

Obama, The Son of Africa, Claims a Continent’s Crown Jewels

Global Research
John Pilger

On 14 October, President Barack Obama announced he was sending United States special forces troops to Uganda to join the civil war there. In the next few months, US combat troops will be sent to South Sudan, Congo and Central African Republic. They will only "engage" for "self-defence", says Obama, satirically. With Libya secured, an American invasion of the African continent is under way.

Obama’s decision is described in the press as "highly unusual" and "surprising", even "weird". It is none of these things. It is the logic of American foreign policy since 1945. Take Vietnam. The priority was to halt the influence of China, an imperial rival, and "protect" Indonesia, which President Nixon called "the region’s richest hoard of natural resources ...the greatest prize". Vietnam merely got in the way; and the slaughter of more than three million Vietnamese and the devastation and poisoning of their land was the price of America achieving its goal. Like all America’s subsequent invasions, a trail of blood from Latin America to Afghanistan and Iraq, the rationale was usually "self defence" or "humanitarian", words long emptied of their dictionary meaning.

In Africa, says Obama, the "humanitarian mission" is to assist the government of Uganda defeat the Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA), which "has murdered, raped and kidnapped tens of thousands of men, women and children in central Africa". This is an accurate description of the LRA, evoking multiple atrocities administered by the United States, such as the bloodbath in the 1960s following the CIA-arranged murder of Patrice Lumumba, the Congolese independence leader and first legally elected prime minister, and the CIA coup that installed Mobutu Sese Seko, regarded as Africa’s most venal tyrant.

Obama’s other justification also invites satire. This is the "national security of the United States". The LRA has been doing its nasty work for 24 years, of minimal interest to the United States. Today, it has fewer than 400 fighters and has never been weaker. However, US "national security" usually means buying a corrupt and thuggish regime that has something Washington wants. Uganda’s "president-for-life" Yoweri Museveni already receives the larger part of $45 million in US military "aid" – including Obama’s favourite drones. This is his bribe to fight a proxy war against America’s latest phantom Islamic enemy, the rag-tag al Shabaab group based in Somalia. The RTA will play a public relations role, distracting western journalists with its perennial horror stories.

However, the main reason the US is invading Africa is no different from that which ignited the Vietnam war. It is China. In the world of self-serving, institutionalised paranoia that justifies what General David Petraeus, the former US commander and now CIA director, implies is a state of perpetual war, China is replacing al-Qaeda as the official American "threat". When I interviewed Bryan Whitman, an assistant secretary of defence at the Pentagon last year, I asked him to describe the current danger to America. Struggling visibly, he repeated, "Asymmetric threats ... asymmetric threats". These justify the money-laundering state-sponsored arms conglomerates and the biggest military and war budget in history. With Osama bin Laden airbrushed, China takes the mantle.

Tuesday, May 24, 2011

73,846 US Soldiers Dead from both Gulf Wars, How they manipulated the numbers to fool you

Federal Jack

Guardsman Gerard Darren Matthew,
sent home from Iraq with mysterious
illnesses, holds baby daughter, Victoria,
who has deformed hand. He has tested positive
for uranium contamination
(ATS)   Iraq War Deaths Exceed Vietnam War Numbers.

Department of Veterans Affairs Reports 73 Thousand U.S. Gulf War Deaths.

More Gulf War Veterans have died than Vietnam Veterans.  This probably is news to you.  But the truth has been hidden by a technicality.  So here is the truth.

The casualties in the Vietnam War were pretty simple to understand.  If a soldier was dead from his combat tour, he was a war casualty.  There are 58,195 names recorded on the Vietnam War Memorial in Washington, DC.

But something odd has happened with the Iraq War.  The government, under the Bush administration, did something dishonest that resulted in a lie that’s persisted since the war began — and continues to this very day.  They decided to report the war deaths in Iraq only if the soldier died with his boots on the ground in a combat situation.

The actual figures have been hidden from the American public just like the returning, flag draped coffins were censored from the press.  But the figures are now available and we can only hope that the American people will be outraged when they learn how they have been misled.

According to The Department of Veterans Affairs, as of May 2007, reports in the Gulf War Veterans Information System reveal these startling numbers:

Total U.S. Military Gulf War Deaths: 73,846

* Deaths amongst Deployed: 17,847


* Deaths amongst Non-Deployed: 55,999


The stastics for non-lethal injuries are likewise staggering:

Total “Undiagnosed Illness” (UDX) claims: 14,874

Total number of disability claims filed: 1,620,906


* Disability Claims amongst Deployed: 407,911


* Disability Claims amongst Non-Deployed: 1,212,995


Percentage of combat troops that filed Disability Claims 36%

I know you probably will think this is another conspiracy theory
full article — www.viewzone.com…

Source: www1.va.gov… Note: Sometimes this link is not active so we have posted the pdf file on viewzone 393 kb.]

More deaths and mysery to follow…

More than 1,820 tons of radioactive nuclear waste (i.e. depleted uranium) were exploded in Iraq alone in the form of armor piercing rounds and bunker busters. This represents the worlds worst man made ecological disaster ever. 64 kg of uranium were used in the Hiroshima bomb. The U.S. Iraq Nuclear Holocaust represents far more than fourteen thousand Hiroshima’s.

The nuclear waste the U.S. has exploded in the Middle East will continue killing for hundreds of years! That’s how long these particles of radioactive dust will continue to blow around, get lodged in someone’s lungs or be ingested. Scientists calculate that there is now enough radioactive material in Iraq to wipe out a third of the world’s current population.

While we never found any WMD’s (Weapons of Mass Destruction) in Iraq, we sure made up for it by importing our own! Birth defects among Iraqi newborns are up a whopping 600% from before the war. The defects are typical of the kind produced by exposure to radioactive poisons. And these injuries are happening to the civilian population of Iraq — the people we were supposedly “liberating.”
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread699497/pg1

Wednesday, April 20, 2011

Deconstructing the US Military: America's Global War against Planet Earth

GlobalResearch
By Dana Visalli
While in Kabul in March of this year, I visited the U.S. military base in that city, Camp Eggers . Knowing I would need a pretext to gain entry, I typed up a letter offering to give a presentation on wildlife in Afghanistan , which I had been studying. When approaching the base, one passes through an initial checkpoint, where a Hummer topped with a machine-gun nest stands guard. Then there is a 100-yard walk down a narrow corridor between high concrete blast walls, at which point one arrives at a guarded entry point through the wall. I showed my passport and letter, and was escorted through a second layer of blast walls to a little wooden information booth in this still-peripheral circle of defense. The pimply young lad manning the booth was flustered by my request; he had never seen anything quite like it. He did what all soldiers do when faced with something new; he phoned his superior for orders on how to proceed.

Permission was granted to pass to the next entry level. At hut #2 another friendly young male soldier by the name of Ryan was equally baffled by my written request, and he dialed up his commanding officer for instructions on what to do with me. Then, with Ryan as my escort, I made it into the inner sanctum of the base, where soldiers and military contractors strolled leisurely around the streets of the former Kabul residential area. After being passed around to several more levels of authority, I finally ended up at the office of Morale, Welfare and Recreation. The female officer in charge there was as confused by my presence as everyone else had been, and after reading my proposal asked rather sternly, “How did he get on the base?” She reprimanded Ryan for bringing me to the center of Camp Eggers, then realized that she would have to phone her commanding officer because there was no standardized protocol on how to deal with me. As we retraced our steps, Ryan remarked that he certainly could not be held accountable for letting me on the base because all he had done was follow orders. In fact, the primary concern of everyone I interacted with at Camp Eggers was to follow the directives of their superiors; no one appeared to have the capacity to take responsibility for their actions.


In the mid-1960s, political scientist Hannah Arendt published a book-length study of how some of the great evils of history, such as slavery and the Holocaust, managed to occur. Her book, Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil, concluded that generally such crimes are not carried out by fanatics or sociopaths, but rather by ordinary people who accepted the premises of their superiors and their state and therefore do what they are told to do, and participate with the view that their actions are normal. The word “banal” is defined as “something that is trite, normal, and commonplace.” The root of the word comes from the Old French word ban, referring to feudal military service, which was compulsory and thus commonly accepted. Thus, military culture is by definition synonymous with banal, which my acquaintances at Camp Eggers demonstrated as they strove to find orders to follow and avoid responsibility for their actions.

Most members of the military establishment receive extensive training in combat techniques, including of course how to kill other human beings. One common drill at boot camp is to have recruits lunge repeatedly at mock human targets with mounted bayonets, shouting “Kill! Kill!” as they stab their imaginary victims. After months of such training, killing itself becomes banal, something normal and commonplace. The military culture of thoughtless submission to authority combined with heavy conditioning to snuff out human life creates a wide path towards the “great evils” that Hannah Arendt addressed.

Examples of what a sane society would call evil acts abound in the annuals of our current wars. For example, in 2010 a group of five American soldiers  murdered a number of Afghan civilians “for sport,” and collected fingers of their victims as trophies. Killing for them had become normal and banal; it was in fact what the soldiers were trained to do.

In March of 2011 two U.S. Army Blackhawk helicopters came upon 10 Afghan children ages 7 to 13 gathering brush to warm their huts and attacked them with heavy machine gun fire. When the parents of the children arrived on the scene, attracted by the gunfire, they could only collect body parts of their children. For the pilots of the helicopters, killing was their job, a normal part of military life.

On March 12, 2006, four U.S. soldiers entered the home of a 14-year old girl in the Iraqi city of Mahmudiya, took her mother, father and sister into a bedroom and shot them, and then gang-raped the girl. Afterwards, they shot her in the head and attempted to burn her body. They then reported the deaths as being the result of an insurgent attack.

On March 25, 2003, Marine Sgt. Eric Schrumpf was participating in the U.S. invasion of Iraq when he spotted an Iraqi soldier in his field of view behind a female Iraqi citizen. He couldn’t get a clear shot with the woman blocking his line of sight, so he shot her to get her out of the line of fire. “I’m sorry, but the chick was in the way,” Schrumpf explained. Later he elaborated, “We had a great day. We killed a lot of people.”

Over the long term, most soldiers committing such murders become victims of their own lack of judgment, unable to live with the profoundly antisocial acts they have committed. Sergeant Schrumpf is himself now debilitated by PTSD, and can scarcely function in civilian society. He has attacked people in movie theaters because he mistakes their cans of Coke for military weapons. "I'll never be the same again," says Schrumpf, who seems somehow mystified by the etiology of his emotional dysfunction.

Similar stories of the fruits of combat duty are limited only by time available to tell them. After serving in the Marines during the 2003 invasion of Iraq , Lance Cpl. Walter Rollo Smith returned home and soon killed his wife, Nicole Marie Speirs, the 22-year-old mother of his twin children.  He drowned her in a bathtub without any evident provocation or reason. In reflecting on his heinous crime, Smith said, “I know for a fact that before I went to Iraq , there’s no way I would have taken somebody else’s life.”

After serving in the Army in Iraq in 2004, Spc. Brandon Bare, 19, of Wilkesboro, N.C, came home and stabbed his wife Nabila Bare, 18, at least 71 times with knives and a meat cleaver. About three dozen of the wounds were on her head and neck. Killing is what he was trained to do.

Mental angst and dysfunction in soldiers returning from combat is commonplace. A recent study indicates that 62% of soldiers returning from the war in Iraq have asked for mental health counseling, with 27% showing dangerous levels of alcohol abuse. Suicide rates among soldiers and vets have increased dramatically in recent years. Over 100,000 Vietnam vets have now killed themselves, far more than died in the Vietnam War. More than 300,000 veterans of the U.S. military are currently homeless, another study reveals.

If war is in fact destroying the youth of America by turning them into trained and traumatized killers, one could at least hope that the wars themselves have some value to American society. 

Objective evidence indicates otherwise. The actual conduct of war bears more resemblance to a circus act than the noble endeavor it is often portrayed to be. To cite one of the many examples of the senselessness of war related in the book Achilles in Vietnam, author and Vietnam vet Jonathan Shay describes how, “During one patrol in the dry season, a U.S. Army squad ran out of water and was not resupplied. They walked for a day and a half in search of water in Vietcong-controlled territory. When men started to collapse from dehydration in the heat, an officer’s plea for emergency resupply was heeded: a helicopter flew over and “bombed” the squad with cases of Tab, seriously injuring one of the men. The major whose helicopter dropped the Tab was recalled to evacuate the casualty. There was no enemy activity. I subsequently read in the division newspaper that the major had put himself in for and had received the Bronze Star for resupplying the troops and evacuating the wounded ‘under fire.’ ” Remember that story the next time you see a soldier’s chest full of medals.

The Vietnam war itself was fought because at the end of World War II, Ho Chi Minh declared Vietnam ’s independence from the colonizing French, reading from the U.S. Declaration of Independence to emphasize his people’s reasonable claim to self-determination. Instead of supporting this universal urge that humanity has for freedom, the U.S. supported the French effort to regain their colony for 10 long years (1945-1954). After the French were defeated, the U.S. fought the Vietnamese for another 22 years (1955-1975). Thus, 32 years of brutal mayhem took place, when all the Vietnamese people were asking for was their independence. The American lives that were ruined—the 58,000 combat deaths, 100,000+ suicides, 300,000 homeless men—were all expended for nothing, as were the 3.4 million Vietnamese who died in that war. To briefly mention another of our recent wars, today the nation of Iraq lies in ruins, the people impoverished, a million dead and 5 million living as refugees, while the entire basis of the U.S. invasion in 2003 is widely acknowledged to have been a complete fabrication.

War itself is not only “a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed,” as Dwight Eisenhower noted in a speech in 1953, but war is also destructive to the physical earth, the very source of human life, and indeed of all life. The U.S. has dropped 15 million tons of bombs on the earth’s surface in last 60 years, spread 1 million tons of napalm on fields and forests, and sprayed 20 million gallons of defoliants on some of the most diverse rainforests on the planet. By any measure, the U.S. military is conducting a war against the earth itself. Such an inane effort does not come cheaply. The total cost of all military expenses for 2012 is estimated to be $1.2 trillion dollars, one-third of the total federal budget. It is the U.S. military that is driving the U.S. itself into bankruptcy.

In summary, the U.S. military is destroying the lives of its own young men while at the same time it devastates other human cultures; it threatens the economic survival of the United States while it is fraying the ecological fabric that makes life on earth possible.

Mikhail Gorbachev once noted that the Soviet system was evil and had to be dismantled. The U.S. military is a similarly evil force loosened on the world. As was done to the repugnant Soviet system, the equally repugnant U.S. military should be completely dismantled, with all soldiers and ships and planes and weapons brought home from the vast web of 1000 American military bases spanning the globe. The savings in terms of human lives, human suffering, ecological integrity and American dollars will be immeasurable. We can then begin to rebuild a national defense consisting of a small militia that can guard our borders and “repel invasions,” as called for in the U.S. Constitution, all the while remembering that the best defense is the making of friends.

Dana Visalli is an ecologist, botanist, and market gardener living in Washington state.

Saturday, April 16, 2011

Portland's KBOO Veterans' Voice show bonds two vets of different eras, same politics

Julie Sullivan
The Oregonian

Marv Simmons, left, and Bill Bires, leave KBOO
studio where they have hosted Veterans' Voice program
for 20 years. "If you're talking about the peace
movement, these particular people
have been to the limit and back.
They have ultimate crediblity on that issue,''
says morning KBOO news director Kathleen Stephenson.
By the time the Americans were captured, the young soldier badly burned in the helicopter crash was struggling. His eyes were swollen shut. As the bound men marched barefoot toward Hanoi, he fell further and further behind.

"I tried to stop, and wait and the guard would push me to keep going," the surviving prisoner of war recalled. "By the  time we stopped to rest, he wasn't with us.

"He's still MIA."

The words from the taped interview with the POW hang in the KBOO radio studio air. Hosts Marvin Simmons, 63, paces and Bill Bires, 82, covers his face. On Fridays, as they have every month for 20 years, they bring listeners a war experience that argues for peace.

In Portland, where progressive politics are measured by youth and social networking, they are radical elders on the radio. They began recording Veteran's Voice on reel-to-reel tapes. The first 10 recordings are out in Simmons' barn in the Coast Range. So are dozens of white crosses they fashioned for one demonstration against the Iraq war. And the wooden coffin they draped in a flag and carried downtown in 2005 for another.

But inside a small sound studio off east Burnside, the two repeatedly agitate. They interview women veterans about military sexual trauma, dissect U.S. policy on land mines, and trace cancer and birth defects due to Agent Orange in Vietnam and in the families of Americans who fought there.

Two years ago, station managers evaluated Veteran's Voice and agreed it told a critical story and that Simmons, Bires and their friends are the storytellers.

"KBOO is a place where things get said that don't get said anywhere else. And of all the places that happens on KBOO, these are the guys with no fear," says longtime engineer Tami  Dean.

She says their credibility comes from being both veterans and elders.

"I is an elder," agrees Bires with a snort.


OLDER AND WISER

Oregon's peace movement is dominated by people who lived through Vietnam.

Some have been activists since then, shifting attention to labor, immigration or U.S. policies in Central America, says Dan Goldrich, a retired political science professor at the University of Oregon. Others re-activated after the Iraq invasion in 2003 and stayed involved even as younger people drifted away with the threat of a possible draft. Older Oregonians say THEY are more active in part because they are beyond the mid-life pressures of raising children and their jobs.

"We have the time and we have the perspective," says Carol Van Houten, 73, of Eugene. "And one thing that keeps me working for change that is true for a lot of older people is that we owe it to our children and grandchildren."

After Vietnam, Marv Simmons drifted through a marriage and back to Oregon when he saw the televised air strikes in the first Gulf War. Outraged, he met a handful of other Vietnam vets at one of the first anti-war rallies at Pioneer Court House Square. He noticed an older man had joined.

Bires had worked as a copper miner and a Teamster, raised a family of six and was nearing retirement. He also survived atomic bomb testing in Nevada and a combat tour in Korea. Both became part of the Northwest Veterans for Peace. One day Simmons put his hand on Bires' shoulder as he was "espousing" a point, Bires says, and the two just bonded. For the first time Simmons could talk openly about Vietnam. It became a friendship of shared activism that has helped them face their diagnosed post traumatic stress and survivor guilt with a sense of purpose.

Simmons says, "He's the best friend I've ever had."

OLDER DOESN'T NECESSARILY MEAN MORE CONSERVATIVE

Last week, a British study showed liberals had more gray matter in the part of the brain that copes with empathy and managing conflicting information, while conservatives had more gray matter in the part that recognizes threats. Scientists say environment, self-interest and families help develop a person's politics. But experiences in young adulthood can also forge a lifelong political bent.

Bires and Simmons, drafted into different wars in different eras, describe an almost identical reaction to combat. "I looked at the Korean refugees streaming from the north, carrying everything they had," Bires recalls. "They were scared to death."

Simmons says: "I started looking around and thought, if we're here to protect these people why are we killing so many civilians? All the old people whose villages were burned and the little kids with no parents. There was so much suffering."

The radio hour gave them the perfect way to discuss such consequences, along with emerging controversies like Gulf War Syndrome, access to VA healthcare and women in the military.

John Timothy Hager, 66, a Keizer chaplain for Nursing Home Ministries and founding member of Northwest Veterans for Peace, has also appeared regularly on the program for 20 years to let "veterans know you are not alone." Simmons plans most of the programs, tracks down and arranges guests. Bires provides the color.

Once he connected with the Portland veterans, Bires traveled to the Nevada test sites, Washington, D.C., and Khazakstan to protest nuclear weapons. He spoke in Japan at the 50th anniversary of Hiroshima. He believes people can change their minds because his own thinking has evolved about women's rights and minorities.

Simmons also talks about his changed thinking, and overcoming discomfort around Asians. Once he recognized those feelings as part of war trauma, he started going to Vietnamese businesses. And after his wife, Lorelle Browning, a professor of Shakespeare and peace and justice issues at Pacific University, won a Fulbright scholarship to teach in Vietnam, he moved there with her for a year. Bires joined them.

Next fall, with another teaching offer, they plan to return to Vietnam. Simmons is involved in an orphanage there. He and his wife help stage theater in Vietnam, and bring Vietnamese actors to the United States.

At age 82 and with congestive heart failure, Bires keeps almost as active. He attends a regular discussion group with Korean vets, and discussion groups at Portland Community College.

And every Friday, Bires and Simmons lunch other vets at a Vietnamese restaurant.

Simmons says, "I'm not sure in any other community that we'd fit in so well. Portland has so many liberal veterans."

The two hope to recruit at least one younger veteran, preferably a woman, to join them at the microphone.

"Until we can stop these guys from going to war in Iraq, Afghanistan and now Libya, all we can do," Simmons says, "is talk."

Monday, April 11, 2011

Obama's Fateful Abuse of War Powers

Uruknet
Paul Findley

The acts of war ordered by President Barack Obama against the government of Libya violated provisions of the U.S. Constitution and the War Powers Resolution of 1973. He also exceeded his authority by pledging U.S. combat support to the United Nations Security Council and to NATO for military measures against Libya. The United States may soon find itself entrapped in a costly civil war in that North African nation.

Congress is complicit in creating this mess, because it failed to demand presidential compliance with the Constitution and public law and neglected its own explicit constitutional duty in the exercise of war powers.

The War Powers Resolution was enacted in the wake of the Vietnam ordeal by Members of Congress, myself included, who considered that war unauthorized by Congress and a gross abuse of Constitutional war powers. Our goal was to prevent future unauthorized presidential wars. I joined other Members of Congress in overriding President Richard Nixon’s veto, and during my remaining years on Capitol Hill I maintained close vigilance on presidential compliance. Compliance was satisfactory by Presidents Ford and Carter, as well as both Presidents Bush. In recent years I find no sign of vigilance or compliance. It is a sad, dangerous state of affairs.

Mandated presidential reports are a major feature of the resolution. In the absence of a war declaration, a written presidential report must be delivered to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President Pro Tempore of the Senate within 24 hours of each order that moves substantial U.S. military forces into hostile areas. It must list reasons for the decision, military forces to be committed, and the expected duration of war measures.

It cites a constitutional way for Congress to overturn any such presidential decision. Any Member of Congress can challenge the president’s decision by introducing a bill called a concurrent resolution of disapproval. If approved by both House and Senate, this legislation requires the president to rescind his war decision. The War Powers Resolution even authorizes expedited parliamentary procedures when a disapproval resolution is introduced in either chamber of Congress.

These provisions were intended to bring Congress close to the president as he ponders war-making decisions, a role clearly intended by the authors of the U.S. Constitution. The resolution limits the time for delivery of presidential reports to 24 hours, hoping the quick deadline will cause the president to give close attention to the likely reaction of Congress. We believed it could be an important, timely restraint on a president whose decision at the moment must be reflective and wise. It would also be a strong reminder that Congress has the power to overturn the president’s decision quickly by enacting a concurrent resolution of disapproval.

In assaulting Libya, President Obama acted as if the War Powers Resolution did not exist. Instead of sending a written report to congressional leaders within 24 hours, as required by law, he did not write until five days after the assault began. The five-day lapse was a violation of law but, in a sense, it was delivered in blinding speed. In recent years, reports mandated by the War Powers Resolution for delivery within 24 hours of presidential decisions, are usually bundled and delivered semi-annually. Yes, semi-annually.

Obama had ample time to consult with congressional leaders during the weeks preceding the assault on Libya, which meant consultations were legally mandated by the War Powers Resolution. None occurred.

From the start, Obama proceeded in a cavalier, almost casual manner. In announcing war measures in Libya, he mentioned neither Congress nor the U.S. Constitution. He did not even return to Washington from a visit in South America to make the announcement. He acted as if war-making is a routine privilege a president may undertake entirely at his option, like shaving or adjusting his necktie, without even a wink or nod toward the people’s branch of government. To this day Congress has not authorized acts of war in Libya.

We must face reality: The War Powers Resolution will work only if Congress is vigilant and demands full compliance by the president. Today’s Members of Congress, like those in the recent past, unwisely see decisions on war as a prickly nettle they are content to leave to the president. They need to be reminded that war is the worst burden government can place on citizens. It becomes heavier with the emergence of massive new high-tech war instruments, each of which magnifies, rather than reduces, the necessity of congressional restraint on presidential war-making. No citizen, not even the president, should have the authority to initiate war measures.

Obama’s abuse of war powers stands the Constitution on its head. He should be ashamed, and so should our complacent Congress for letting it happen.


- Paul Findley served as a Republican Representative from Illinois 1961-83 and is the founder of the Council for the National Interest and a board member of If Americans Knew. He has written six books, including the first book on the Israel Lobby, They Dare to Speak Out. His latest, Speaking Out: A congressman’s lifelong fight against bigotry, famine, and war, will be published in June by Chicago Review Press (Lawrence Hill Books imprint). This article was published in www.cnionline.org.