Tuesday, June 28, 2011

From Britain: RIBA, AIA and Aaronovitch Attack Gage, Fail to Refute His Findings

Notice the similar, frumpy, hackneyed tactics by those professionals protecting the official story of 9/11.   No attempt to address or dispute the evidence presented by architect Richard Gage, but instead an immediate accusation of being "anti-semitic".  The lady doth protest too much.  Who instructed the British RIBA and other trade groups to use the tactic of slandering and libeling Richard Gage, AIA instead of using their expertise to refute Gage's findings?

This is a clear indication that they cannot refute Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, regardless of any spin to come out of the so-called debunkers,  Honest assessments by outside observers indicate that Gage has scored a substantial victory for the 9/11 Truth movement.

Here is a great example by 9/11 Truth advocate and artist, Scootle Royal (Wake Up American Slobs).

Scootle Royale
Debunking the Debunkers

It seems the heads of the Britain and America's top architectural organizations are annoyed that Gage got to talk at the Royal Institute of British Architects, accusing him of using RIBA's name to give credibility to a 'bonkers' conspiracy theory. The Randi-crowd are of course using this fact to argue that Gage is crazy.

I live in Wiltshire, which is a four hour, sixty pound train journey via multiple changes and a tube ride away from Cambridge, but only 45 minutes away from Bristol. So while I couldn't attend Gage's talk at Cambridge University last saturday, I was able to see him in Bristol on tuesday. I had intended to stick around meet him afterwards but the Q&A dragged on too long and I didn't want to miss the last train home so I had to leave early. Anyway, I can assure you there was no 'conspiracy theory' in his presentation. In fact he's even taken out Larry Silverstein's 'pull it' comment. When asked about this in the Q&A he said he took it out because he was fed up with arguing with people over what 'pull it' meant, prefering instead to stick to the science.

Now assuming the presentation I saw was the same as the one given to RIBA in London, I know David Aaronovitch is talking crap when he says "What they mean is that George Bush and the Zionists brought down the towers. The RIBA let itself out to a conspiracy theory organisation whose theories are utterly insane."

The only theory that is utterly insane is NIST's thermal expansion theory. At one point in the presentation I saw, after outlining the thermal expansion theory, Gage said something like "There are so many things wrong with this, but for the sake of time I will only list twelve!" and then went on a rapid fire tirade simply on why the idea of heated floor beams remaining rigid, breaking numerous bolts and studs in unison and pushing against a girder, instead of just sagging, is ludicrous. If Aaronovitch, who attended the RIBA lecture, accepts the official story of 9/11, then that is what he endorses!

Apparently, Aaronovitch has agreed to debate Gage ...

When question time began, quick on his feet and first to the microphone was David Aaronovitch, Times columnist and self-styled expert on ‘conspiracy theories’. Charlie Skelton, a freelancer who writes for The Guardian, observed that of all Aaronovitch's four points, presented as questions like ‘what happened to the passengers on the planes?’, none addressed the subject matter of the presentation. Gage's bald answer to each was essentially: ‘I don’t know. I’m not an expert on conspiracies but on building design.’ When Aaronovitch complained that the meeting was biased against the official story of 9/11, he was challenged to take part in a balanced debate with Richard Gage. Two hundred people heard him say yes, but one organiser predicted that he never would.
Ready this July
Visit www.ae911truth.org
Of course Aaronovitch consistently claims that there isn't any evidence for our position. Richard Gage's presentations are full of such hard evidence which Aaronovitch claims doesn't exist. So Aaronovitch's ego drives him to engage in all kinds of mental gymnastics to dismiss the evidence being presented. As I've said before, it's very much like Cartman in that South Park episode with the 'Fishsticks' joke. There's some psychology for you Mr Aaronovitch!

And what does Aaronovitch say about the presentation? ... absolutely nothing whatsoever ... other than an anecdote about someone in Gage's audience and his apparent anti-semitism. Note the highlighted box quote: "Most of us can avoid sharing air time with known racists". Does he have anything other than guilt-by-association arguments?





 

Help Us Transmit This Story


  Add to Your Blogger Account
  Put it On Facebook
  Tweet this post
  Print it from your printer
  Email and a collection of other outlets
  Try even more services

2 comments:

  1. Richard Gage has not done nearly enough to confront the builders of the WTCs about setting up the buildings for demolition as they were constructed. His timidity belies a hesitance to expose the true culprits. I have known of what they did for over 40 years. The painters did not know, but all top management did. See Activist Post: Architects and Engineers Question... comments section and read Chris Bollyn and Jeff Prager's work, available FREE on the net.
    Use your minds people. How possibly could a minimum of 280 stories of office building be perfectly set with charges without the occupants realizing there was dust and cement chips and paint spatters and taping mud foot prints all over the place? (Each one of those floors was nearly as big as a football field.) Easy, numbskulls, it was done during construction. SEEK OUT PROOF YOU CHICKEN-SHIT SOBs.
    Windtunnel testing was done at Boeing in Seattle. Retriggering is best covered by Bollyn's work and Prager has proof of nukes and motive beyond the exterior's disintegration which he has covered thoroughly and undeniably. Dr. Ed Ward, MD covers nuke treaties between the U.S. and U.S.S.R. and commercial applications. Brilliant stuff. You people have had ten years to bring integrity to this country and you failed. Get on it or suffer BIG-TIME. Nobody is questioning the perps and the bloody judge gave this over-insured white elephant double payout as well as a return of 100% of the equity paid on a officially condemned money loser. Start with the Activist Post reference above. That is what I KNOW. Not guess.
    America is still under attack and the enemy is within the walls. See dutchsinse.com and search: Dimona dozen v. Fukushima 50 and do it soon so you can tell your grandchildren you helped save the country instead of mewling like those pieces of crap in congress.

    ReplyDelete
  2. ’9-11 Fake Video’ Stars – The JSTAR Clones http://www.rense.com/general92/911fk.htm Why Covert Ops Must Have ‘Fake’ Video

    Concise Briefing: Past/Present Global Tyranny – Basic Proof, ID, and Remedy = Proven 9-11 Nukes + Included Links

    Proven 9-11 Nukes = US Government Involvement http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2010/09/06/proven-9-11-nukes-us-government-involvement/

    Dr. Ed Ward, MD – DEWD

    Ed Ward MD’s Weblog of Tyranny http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/ http://www.facebook.com/EdWardMD3 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EdWard-MD/

    German High Court Outlaws Electronic Voting
    Wednesday, 21 October 2009, 9:45 am
    http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0910/S00187.htm

    Hacking Democracy – 90 minutes of proof the vote is fixed on multiple levels.
    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7926958774822130737#

    City of New Orleans, LA & 36 Other State’s Elections Fixed? http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/06/07/17/ward.htm

    FIXED VOTE = NO VOTE http://www.flickr.com/photos/66799032@N08/6120141236/in/photostream http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2009/10/23/fixed-vote-no-vote-i-will-not-assist-thin-air-vote-counting/

    ReplyDelete